Strictly talking refractors; if I had a choice between a 6" APO with a quality binoviewer or a binoscope comprised of two 5" APOs. Which setup would transmit more light to the eyes? Visually, would it be that noticeable of a difference? I can tell the difference when using a binoviewer on my 5" APO as opposed to a single eyepiece but it got me wondering.
Binoscope/Binoviewer with refractors
Started by gmanzero, 02/23/2004 12:39PM
Posted 02/23/2004 12:39PM
Opening Post
Posted 02/23/2004 01:18PM
#1
Greg,
A 5" scope has a light grasp of 19.6 square inches. A 6" scope has a light grasp of 28.3 square inches.
Given two lenses of a similar type the 6" will transmit more light than the 5" inch. A binoviewer will divide that light between the two eyes. A binoscope will not. The dual 5 inch should have a light grasp of 39.2 square inches. This would provide much more light.
I have a pair of Meade 90's I would like to make a binoscope out of. The problem is the IP distance will be at least 90mm with both scopes side by side. I am thinking about cutting the tubes so they will each focus with dual diagonals and putting my head in between the OTA's
Don Durbin
A 5" scope has a light grasp of 19.6 square inches. A 6" scope has a light grasp of 28.3 square inches.
Given two lenses of a similar type the 6" will transmit more light than the 5" inch. A binoviewer will divide that light between the two eyes. A binoscope will not. The dual 5 inch should have a light grasp of 39.2 square inches. This would provide much more light.
I have a pair of Meade 90's I would like to make a binoscope out of. The problem is the IP distance will be at least 90mm with both scopes side by side. I am thinking about cutting the tubes so they will each focus with dual diagonals and putting my head in between the OTA's
Don Durbin
Posted 02/23/2004 01:23PM
#2
Greg,
I cannot answer your question, but I'd sure like to be a part of the testing. Let me know when and where
Just looking at the square inch issues:
5" x 2 = 38 sq inches (19 sq in / eye)
6" = 28 sq inches (14 sq in / eye without loss)
I think the 5" would be better. A better comparison might be a dual 4" to a binoviewer 6":
4" x 2 = 25 sq in (12.5 / eye)
So in that case, the 6" would be brighter and have more resolution. I'm thinking you can get two 4 inch APOs for less than one 6" APO, but I'm not certain.
Clear skies,
Tom
I cannot answer your question, but I'd sure like to be a part of the testing. Let me know when and where
Just looking at the square inch issues:
5" x 2 = 38 sq inches (19 sq in / eye)
6" = 28 sq inches (14 sq in / eye without loss)
I think the 5" would be better. A better comparison might be a dual 4" to a binoviewer 6":
4" x 2 = 25 sq in (12.5 / eye)
So in that case, the 6" would be brighter and have more resolution. I'm thinking you can get two 4 inch APOs for less than one 6" APO, but I'm not certain.
Clear skies,
Tom
Funding Member
Sponsors
- GetLeadsFast, LLC
- APM-Telescopes
- Astromart Customer Service
- Pier-Tech Inc.
- AstroMart LLC
- ADM
- OMI OPTICS USA LLC
- Matsumoto Company
- Anacortes Telescope
- Denkmeier Optical
- Desert Sky Astro Products
- T.E.C
- Rouz Astro
- FocusKnobs
- jp Astrocraft, LLC
- SellTelescopes.com
- ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY BY MARTIN PUGH
View all sponsors