Image of the day

From the
ATWB Customer Gallery

Milky Way with ISS

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Burgess 6mm Planetary EPs

Started by DonDurbin, 08/07/2005 07:12PM
Posted 08/07/2005 07:12PM Opening Post
Hi All,

I took my new pair of 6mm Planetary EPs out for a quick spin around
Jupiter tonight. I used my TAK FS-128 so no optical correctors were
needed.

I decided I like these EPs. They are certainly worth the current
price of $49 each.

I compared the pair of 6mm Planetary EPs with a 6mm Expanse that I have. The contrast was better and the image was brighter in the Burgess EPs.

I compared the pair of 6mm Planetary EPs with my 9mm HD Ortho's. The image in the Ortho's was sharper, but that was more do to the 9mm versus 6mm view. I only mention these EPs because I got a surprising insight with them. I found that the Burgess pair of 6mm Planetary EPs required a half turn less in-travel on my TAK FS-128 than the HD Ortho's.

I compared the pair of 6mm Planetary EPs to a pair of Televue 4.8mm
Naglers. The pair of 6mm Planetary EPs lost that match up. The
Televue 4.8 Naglers had a slightly better image and required the
least in-travel of the EPs I tried. They also cost more than double.

I compared the pair of 6mm Planetary EPs with my pair of 8mm Televue
Plossl's. I think the Burgess pair of 6mm Planetary EPs had as sharp
an image as the 8mm Televue Plossls.

In the Burgess Binoviewer I did have a little problem with merging
these EPs at first. The step barrel allowed on of the EPs to cock
slightly. I had heard other people complain of this before but this
is the first time I experienced it. I wish the EPs would have come
with smooth barrels. Higher powered EPs are also naturally harder to
merge and required a more precise alignment.

In my 22mm Blacknight Binoviewer I did not have any problem with
these EPs. The BlackNight Self Centering Holders did the best job
holding these EPs

In my premium Denkmeier Binoviewer I did see a problem with the EPs
being slightly loose even when the SCDs were fully tightened. The
compression device hits the step ring in a bad place. Once again a
smooth barrel would have worked better here.

Don Durbin
Posted 08/07/2005 08:31PM #1
Thank for your most informative posts. We are in your debt for such helpful information. I also have the Siebert Black Night 22mm and am on the list for the 45mm Elite binoviewer. If anyone has one of these or can steer me to where I can read more about them I would appreciated it. I have been waiting quite some time on them and would like to hear from those who have had a chance to look though them. I am particularly interested in how they would work on a 10" LX200. What eyepiece choices would be good and so forth. I want to get a good low power view and with a big SCT like mine that is not easy.

M.R.

M. R.
10 Meade SCT.
8" Orion Dob
80ED APO
Siebert 1.5x-7x MM OCA
BN 22mm (45mm 2" Elite Binoviewer on order)
and Siebert 15mm and 24mm Ultra ep's
Posted 08/08/2005 03:12AM | Edited 08/08/2005 03:14AM #2
Don't forget, this is not the final design for this eyepiece. That is why they were being sold for $49.00. I talked to Thomas Back about these. He told me that a slight design change is going to make them better than they already are. smile