Image of the day

From the
ATWB Customer Gallery

NGC 1893

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Denk II vs. Binotron-27

Started by kmcgrew, 11/02/2015 06:49AM
Posted 11/02/2015 06:49AM Opening Post
How does the Binotron-27 compare to the Denkmeier II Binoviewer? Can the filter holder for the Binotron-27 also be used with the Denk II?

Posted 11/06/2015 08:27AM #1
Optically, no differences I can see.



1. Lighter in weight than Denk II's, less torque on visual back, diagonal and tube assembly
2. Slightly better SCD than DII's. When focusing each, they stay centered
3. Nice construction/build quality. I love the rubber coating.
4. Self-collimation feature. Easy to do and allows those who have had trouble merging images a MUCH better shot at using bino-viewers.


1. Longer light path (~5/8") relative to Denk II's due to the self-collimation feature
2. Self-collimation feature. Collimation may not stay put, requiring adjustment from time to time (but super easy to do).
3. Not quite backward compatible with older power/filter switches and nose pieces. Older accessories may not screw into B27's all the way and B27 accessories may be a loose fit into the DII's.
4. Requires more intrusion into a newt's light path at low power relative to DII's (using same power OCS, 1.2X or 1.4X).

I've got both.

I use the DII's with the newts and those refractors I've not cut back (TEC 200 & 140ED and TMB 152 F8) to reach focus sans OCS. I can reach focus with these refractors with the DII's but not the B27's as long as I use the Denk dovetail diagonal. I also use the DII's with my MCT's as they have the shorter light path. Also, also, I use the DII's with my newts for Con # 4 above.

I use the B27's with all of the refractors that I've cut back as I've typically left ~1.0" -1.5" of in-travel with the DenkII's which is more than enough to handle the extra 5/8" of light path the B27's have relative to the DII's.

Hope this helps.


"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things" 8O