My LX10 has finally been buried and I am looking for a replacement. I have always loved Meade SCT's and have been thinking about getting either a used LX200 or used LX90. At my age (72), an 8" is about as heavy as I can handle. Being on VA disability and a fixed income, new is out of the question. I would also like to use the old LX10 equatorial tripod so save money. This will probably be the last telescope I purchase so I want to make this a satisfactory buy.
Based on all the comments I have read, I think if you are going to buy a used LX200 it should either be a newer model or an older model where the electronics have been upgraded (i.e. a dudash upgrade) including having the motors checked. Is this correct? Does spending more for a GPS (original or add on make sense? Finally, I noticed that there is a difference between ACF and non-ACF models? Again is this worth it.
Some people seem thrilled with their LX90's . What are the advantages or disadvantages vs the LX200? I believe that I will have to buy an adapter plate the mount the LX90 on my old LX10 tripod. Again, is ACF and GPS worth it?
Any advice would be sincerely appreciated.
Thanks
OKLES
Based on all the comments I have read, I think if you are going to buy a used LX200 it should either be a newer model or an older model where the electronics have been upgraded (i.e. a dudash upgrade) including having the motors checked. Is this correct? Does spending more for a GPS (original or add on make sense? Finally, I noticed that there is a difference between ACF and non-ACF models? Again is this worth it.
Some people seem thrilled with their LX90's . What are the advantages or disadvantages vs the LX200? I believe that I will have to buy an adapter plate the mount the LX90 on my old LX10 tripod. Again, is ACF and GPS worth it?
Any advice would be sincerely appreciated.
Thanks
OKLES