Image of the day

Captured by
mikhail vasilenko

NGC4216 with supernova 2024gy

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Global population and environmentalism

Started by Patagonia, 02/09/2009 10:34PM
Posted 02/09/2009 10:34PM Opening Post
Interesting to read some of the comments at the bottom of this article:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7865332.stm

Posted 02/09/2009 10:51PM | Edited 02/09/2009 10:51PM #1
I think this comment was one of the most disturbing.

The problem of overpopulation is compounded by the fact that ignorant and low mentality individuals typically reproduce at a much higher rate than educated individuals which results in huge populations of people who simply cannot understand why or how to practice birth control and who have no hope of being able to provide for themselves or their offsprings. Continually providing food and resources to these bursting populations without requiring contraception only increases the suffering. Rational and intelligent people should voluntarily reduce the size of their families and those who do not have the mental capacity to understand this need should be compelled by law.
Rhonda Richardson, Lynchburg, Va., USA


What an elitist nazi. The environmental movement would do well to distance themselves for this type of thinking.

Andreas


DSOs observed:
NGCs 2005, ICs 103, Other 70, Palomar GCs 6, Abell PNs 12, Herschel 400: 316.
Equipment
Celestron CPC 1100, Lunt 60mm Ha Solar Scope
Posted 02/10/2009 03:29PM #2
Jason Cosford said:

Interesting to read some of the comments at the bottom of this article:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7865332.stm


The big question is "who wins?" when it comes to population.

Will it be superstition (and Malthus) or common sense?


Uncle Rod

Time on your hands?
Waste it with Uncle Rod's Astro Blog!

http://uncle-rods.blogspot.com/
Posted 02/10/2009 03:54PM | Edited 02/10/2009 03:55PM #3
What struck me most about the comments to this article is that views are so polarized. Either you are an ignorant breeder contributing to the death of us all or you are an elitist misanthropic fascist set on mass extermination. I applaud the author for bringing up the "elephant in the room" because sensible discussion is clearly needed. Economic and social equality in the developing world would lead to diminished birth rates, as happened in developed countries, without the need for some government "culling of the heard." The flip side is that with greater development comes increased per capita resource use. So, there needs to be more efficient use of resources as well.

Now is the time to be talking about these issues.