more scientific predictions :-)

Started by drgenovese, 03/13/2015 12:03AM
Posted 03/13/2015 12:03AM Opening Post
http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/05/new-york-city-global-warming/
Posted 03/17/2015 01:04AM | Edited 03/17/2015 01:07AM #1
For as long as there have been experts, experts have been predicting calamity and doom.

It's funny that in the article he links to an NCDC surface temperature chart that is utter BS. Fantastical fabricated data that shows the 1930's as cooler than now.

According the the experts, snow was supposed to be a thing of the past by now.

Now they are saying that snow is caused by global warming. Because, what else can they say when they have been wrong 100% of the time?

Now they are saying that cyclone Pam was caused by climate change because it was big. The biggest in history, some say. Which is a big fat lie. Apparently one cyclone is enough for these geniuses to see a climate change signature. Or one tropical storm like Sandy. If climate change caused more and bigger cyclones, and there is climate change, there would be more and bigger cyclones. But there is not. So cyclones cannot indicate climate change. They'll have to go back to snow as an indicator because there is still snow.

Find the global warming signature in cyclone frequency:


Find the global warming signature in global hurricane frequency and/or major hurricane frequency:


Find the global warming signature in U.S. hurricane landfalls:


Find the global warming signature in the number of extreme tornadoes:


If you can do it, you're as smart as a government climate expert. If you can't, you're an ignorant denier, and Al Gore urges people to “punish climate-change deniers". So find that signature fast!