Image of the day

From the
ATWB Customer Gallery

Cocoon Nebula

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Margaret Sanger wasn't really a racist.

Started by richartisticwoods, 06/30/2020 05:21AM
Posted 07/01/2020 01:52PM | Edited 07/01/2020 01:59PM #30
Originally Posted by James Lacey


Honestly, I have often thought this is one of the main reasons Rich is such an ardent Trump supporter. They have the same psychosis and utter disconnect from reality, and I suppose seeing your illness in someone else somehow validates or redeems your behavior? All I know is you would be hard-pressed to tell the difference between Rich and Trump some times.
Hmm...does it piss you off that I was able to put a spotlight on your hypocrisy?  

It sure appears so.  

You've proven James, to be the poster child of the hypocrites on the left.

I have to say, I've seen a lot in the years that I've been on this forum, but even you managed to astound me over the last several days.

I never thought I'd see the day, when an African American leftist would give moral support to and defend one of the biggest racists in US history, simply because she founded an organization that agrees with his stance on abortion.  

Planned Parenthood, "systematically" has killed not millions, but 10s of million of unborn babies since its inception back in the early part of the century, most of them black, and yet you'll praise her as "not as much of a racist but as a promoter of abortion rights".   

So congratulations James you win the prize.    

Margaret Sanger WAS the worst example of a hateful white bigot that managed to pull the wool over the eyes of poor blacks in the South, by getting them to abort their babies.  

She achieved that as well as getting such name recognition in the abortion promoting community of PP.

There is not ONE redeeming quality to Margaret Sanger as an individual.  Her writings prove as much.  

And all you can muster when I point this out is to make snide remarks?  

I didn't expect anything different.  

I suppose when a person has nothing of substance with which to argue, the next best thing is to attempt to insult your way to victory.  

I'll say this, there is a saying that the Devil's biggest trick was convincing the world that he doesn't exist. 

Well, Margaret Sanger has been able over nearly the last century to get people like yourself to defend her.  

And you claim that I am the person who has a psychotic illness and disconnect from reality??

Have you walked by a mirror lately?  wink

My suggestion to you is keep up your focus on your feeble attempts to insult me.

I can assure you, that if you think that comparing me to Donald Trump is somehow hurting me?  

You'd be wrong about that as well.  wink 
Posted 07/01/2020 02:32PM | Edited 07/01/2020 02:34PM #31
Originally Posted by James Lacey


Honestly, I have often thought this is one of the main reasons Rich is such an ardent Trump supporter. They have the same psychosis and utter disconnect from reality, and I suppose seeing your illness in someone else somehow validates or redeems your behavior? All I know is you would be hard-pressed to tell the difference between Rich and Trump some times.
And permit me to put up the pertinent part of James Brown's posting to me, not the bit you sliced:

Originally stated by Jim Brown:


"If you in fact were speaking via private message or by other off-line means about a forum participant's alleged sex life or sexual orientation it is beyond disgusting and creepy.  I hope to never interface with you again on this forum or anywhere else for that matter.  Life is too short to waste time dealing with sick and potentially dangerous cranks.


Everyone else
who posts here is above that sort of juvenile pastime.  I'm willing to bet that you were simply lying in the line quoted above, to enhance your lies with a bit of threat thrown in.  It is a sick and nasty lie and threat - but these are your specialties.

I know from hard experience that you'll reply with a word-salad of personal attacks".


So my response to his posting above would be

"Gee, no irony there, eh Jim"?

 Sorry to hear that you are concerned that I might respond in kind, to your considerate, thoughtful posting about me and my character, with a "word salad of personal attacks" on your character.  

Gosh, I'd hate to do that. That would be totally uncalled for!   wink 

  
Posted 07/01/2020 04:29PM #32
Originally Posted by Richard Davis
I never thought I'd see the day, when an African American leftist would give moral support to and defend one of the biggest racists in US history, simply because she founded an organization that agrees with his stance on abortion.  

There are so many things wrong with this statement; it would take days to unpack them all. Let me just say this, though; I never defended Margaret Sanger. I merely pointed out that you were copying and pasting from propaganda sites that misrepresented her in the worst ways possible. That is by cherry-picking incomplete quotes and taking them out of context. As usual, all the other stuff you are accusing me of and complaining about is just you continuing to flail at the make-believe alternate reality that only exists in your psychotic mind.
Posted 07/01/2020 05:14PM | Edited 07/01/2020 05:15PM #33
Originally Posted by James Lacey


There are so many things wrong with this statement; it would take days to unpack them all. Let me just say this, though; I never defended Margaret Sanger. I merely pointed out that you were copying and pasting from propaganda sites that misrepresented her in the worst ways possible. That is by cherry-picking incomplete quotes and taking them out of context. As usual, all the other stuff you are accusing me of and complaining about is just you continuing to flail at the make-believe alternate reality that only exists in your psychotic mind.
You minimized her racism and you were pretty complete about that,  even to the extent that you provided the excuse by comparison to other whites at the time, saying that she was in all kinds of company.

You even listed the names, as if that would make her blatant and brazen racism OK.  

I don't cherry pick, I posted your words:   "Sanger wasn't as much a racist as a proponent for women having access to contraception, which at the time was illegal in the US".  

If you want to spin them now, and try to provide some sort of context in order to excuse her racism that's your prerogative.  

I certainly never distorted your words, however I found your excuses for her racism to be shocking. 

You wrote this horseshit:   "Sanger did dabble in support of eugenics"

Dabble?  Boy if that isn't a joke of a statement I don't know what is.  

Putting up names like Mark Twain, H.G. Wells, and others like the racist Democrat President Woodrow Wilson as some sort of verification to present Eugenics in a positive light is pathetic beyond words.

She was an evil BITCH. 

Can you bring yourself to have the intellectual honesty and integrity to admit that?  

Its obvious that you cannot.  

I reposted verbatim what you wrote, and I didn't even post More of your statement, which was even more excusing of her.

You still can't even bring yourself to admit that the woman was a raging anti-semite and a racist against varying ethnic groups.

And why can't you?  The answer is obvious.

Like all LEFTISTS you can't admit ANYTHING that would give evidence to show that one of YOUR Revered institutions was founded on completely racist principles, because that would UNDERMINE the veracity and decency OF SAID INSTITUTIONS.

That is what makes you flat out, an intellectual FRAUD.  

In fact you even doubled down and gave this bullshit crap about PP, which has been debunked as lies:

Planned parenthood provides all kind of services to women in poor communities that would not otherwise have access to them. The services include prenatal care, pelvic exams, STD testing, treatment and vaccination, cancer screenings, and so forth and so on.

The only Pelvic exams they provide are to check out the cervix when they are getting ready to destroy a baby in the womb.

And the very woman who RUNS the place admitted that they DON'T do Breast cancer exams, a lie that was foisted upon us by the leftist apologists like you.

They do NOT perform cancer testing.  That is a flat out lie.

They exist for one purpose only, to eradicate human life in POOR, mostly minority communities around the nation.  

If they weren't supported MASSIVELY by taxpayers, this vile institution wouldn't exist.  Their MAIN function is to provide abortions.  

They are a vile despicable organization, that has duped young women into thinking their ONLY option is to kill their babies in the womb.

The damage they do to women is vast and lasting.  

You support them and then tout yourself as a women's right supporter.

Just sad.  

P.S. They SELL human organs harvested from the babies they kill in the womb, to the highest bidder.


That is a FACT.

What's your opinion on that, or are you too cowardly to express it?