Not entirely sure what the above was supposed to mean. James' posts were quite understandable without divining an implication. Conciseness helps with clear communication.Originally Posted by Richard Davis
Actually his implication was that because he made a big deal about it.
James did not "imply" that you were the only one engaging in ad hominem attacks. He merely pointed out your then most recent example, out of thousands of predecessor examples. The so-called "implication" is a figment of your imagination and feeds your weird need to paint yourself as the victim.
Jim