Originally Posted by James Lacey
It defies credulity to claim that he did not know. If ***** did not hear about this intelligence, then he is absurdly incompetent. If he did hear about it and did nothing, then he is still ridiculously inept.
Ok, since we both Agree that Obama
is ridiculously inept and that it defies credulity to claim that Obama
did not know, what is the solution for a lying President like Obama?
Do you think it is possible to retroactively Impeach Obama for being such a "ridiculously inept President" ?
Since You and I are finally both on the same page, let me help with evidence to prove our
assertion that Obama lied all the time about knowing anything:
Headline: The White House Says It Had No Idea The DOJ Seized The AP's Phone Records
Headline: Carney: Obama Didn't Know About Fast & Furious Until He Saw It In Media
Headline: NSA denies Obama knew of spying on German leader
Headline: HHS chief: President didn't know of Obamacare website woes beforehand
Headline: Obama claims he didn't know about Petraus Investigation
Here is a specific take down of the NY Times for its forgetfulness
about the times they ignored Obama's lies.
Like I said, and I know that you'll agree with me, the NY Times has ZERO credibility
Here are more lies by Obama from the article below:
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/365393-how-quickly-ny-times-forgets-obamas-lies-and-frauds"Obama responded to Snowden’s stunning revelations of the National Security Agency’s vacuuming up millions of Americans’ personal data by going on the Jay Leno Show and proclaiming: “There is no spying on Americans.” Obama’s verbal defenses of NSA spying collapsed like a row of houses of cards. In early 2009, Obama visited Mexico and, in a spiel calling for the renewal of the assault weapon ban, asserted that “more than 90 percent of the guns recovered in Mexico come from the United States.” This vastly overstated the actual problem, since that statistic measured only firearms that Mexican authorities sent to the U.S. for tracing.Obama’s animosity to the Second Amendment spurred some of his most farcical whoppers. In July 2016, Obama asserted: “We flood communities with so many guns that it is easier for a teenager to buy a Glock than get his hands on a computer or even a book.” Glocks are the Lexus of handguns, and a person could buy hundreds of volumes of used books via Amazon for the price of a Glock.A year earlier, Obama bewailed “neighborhoods where it’s easier for you to buy a handgun and clips than it is for you to buy a fresh vegetable.” Obama never offered a single example of a locale where carrots are rarer than .38 Specials. But his false claim helped frighten clueless suburbanites to support Obama’s anti-gun agenda. The Times column lists only one Obama falsehood on the Affordable Care Act: “If you like your doctor, you'll be able to keep your doctor; if you like your health care plan, you'll be able to keep your health care plan.” Obama’s dozens of variations and recitals of this lie were disregarded. The Times also ignored the fact that the ObamaCare legislation was carefully crafted to con Congress and the public. As its intellectual godfather, MIT economist Jonathan Gruber, explained:
“Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically, that was really, really critical to get this thing to pass.”
Thankfully, for once, you and I Forrest are on the same page!!!