New to astronomyPosted By Fred Lusk |
John…
I have two main telescopes: a Celeston CPC-800 and a Celestron C5+. I don't do a lot of astrophotography, and what I do is pretty simple. I mostly do star trails and wide-field piggyback imaging with two 35-mm cameras (lenses ranging from fish-eye to 135 mm) and prime focus images of the Sun and Moon with the 35-mm cameras or a DSLR.
Last year I bought an $800 Celestron Advanced VX mount to replace an Orion SkyView Pro that I used with the 5" SCT. The Orion is a nice, sturdy, non-computerized GEM, but the gears are not up to prime focus astrophotography and a non-computerized mount is a pain for public star parties. The Orion was fine for wide-field piggy-back work up to at least a 135-mm lens, but even at 790 mm (5" SCT + 0.63x focal reducer), all my stars looked like little footballs.
My initial trials of the Advanced VX have been very encouraging with respect to prime focus astrophotography. The 5" SCT + focal reducer + Olympus E-5 DSLR (4:3) format produces an angle of view equivalent to 1580 mm with a 35-mm camera. All exposures so far have produced round stars.
The Advanced VX is rated for 30 lbs, but for astrophotography you should derate it some (maybe by 1/3?). In any event, it may be the best GEM in its price range. One really neat feature is its polar alignment routine, which is so much more accurate than a polar axis scope. If you decide to get the Advanced VX, I have one suggestion for you: for critical polar alignments, go through the routine twice. I generally find a small residual polar alignment error after the first run-through.
Fred
I have two main telescopes: a Celeston CPC-800 and a Celestron C5+. I don't do a lot of astrophotography, and what I do is pretty simple. I mostly do star trails and wide-field piggyback imaging with two 35-mm cameras (lenses ranging from fish-eye to 135 mm) and prime focus images of the Sun and Moon with the 35-mm cameras or a DSLR.
Last year I bought an $800 Celestron Advanced VX mount to replace an Orion SkyView Pro that I used with the 5" SCT. The Orion is a nice, sturdy, non-computerized GEM, but the gears are not up to prime focus astrophotography and a non-computerized mount is a pain for public star parties. The Orion was fine for wide-field piggy-back work up to at least a 135-mm lens, but even at 790 mm (5" SCT + 0.63x focal reducer), all my stars looked like little footballs.
My initial trials of the Advanced VX have been very encouraging with respect to prime focus astrophotography. The 5" SCT + focal reducer + Olympus E-5 DSLR (4:3) format produces an angle of view equivalent to 1580 mm with a 35-mm camera. All exposures so far have produced round stars.
The Advanced VX is rated for 30 lbs, but for astrophotography you should derate it some (maybe by 1/3?). In any event, it may be the best GEM in its price range. One really neat feature is its polar alignment routine, which is so much more accurate than a polar axis scope. If you decide to get the Advanced VX, I have one suggestion for you: for critical polar alignments, go through the routine twice. I generally find a small residual polar alignment error after the first run-through.
Fred