Image of the day

Captured by
David Marks

Lightning in the desert

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Dick Jacobson

December 24, 2009 12:12 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Multifocal cataract implants

Posted By Dick Jacobson

I am scheduled for cataract surgery and am wondering what type of implanted lenses will work best. Conventional "monofocal" lenses correct only for distance vision so you need to use reading glasses. Newer "multifocal" or "accomodative" lenses provide correction at different distances so many people don't need any glasses at all.

The multifocal lenses have concentric zones that focus light from various distances. The accomodative lenses shift position in your eye and are supposed to mimic the focusing of a natural lens to some extent. From what I have read, the distance correction of multifocal lenses is not likely to be as good as with monofocal lenses. Some people report haloes at night or loss of contrast. This seems logical since some of the light is sharply focused from a distance while another portion is sharply focused from nearby. Also, it seems to me that a narrow beam of light that you would get from a high powered eyepiece would create distortions as it passed through the different zones of a multifocal implant.

For these reasons, I am leaning toward getting the conventional monofocal implants. One article recommends monofocal lenses for anyone who needs the best possible night vision.

Does anyone have experience with multifocal or accomodative cataract implants?


January 25, 2010 12:51 PM Forum: Telescope Making

Periscope accessory for Newtonians

Posted By Dick Jacobson

I am building a periscope accessory that will attach to the side of a big Newtonian to lower the eyepiece height. Does anyone know if this has been done before? I've heard of a periscopic Newtonian that was spotted many years ago at the Texas Star Party.

June 24, 2010 06:45 AM Forum: Equipment Talk

Re: Custom metal fabricator recommendation needed

Posted By Dick Jacobson

You might try Bill Volna at http://volnaengineering.com/. I think he does anodizing as well as machining. He's a great guy and a member of my local astronomy club.

July 14, 2010 08:55 AM Forum: Equipment Talk

Infrared dew evaporator

Posted By Dick Jacobson

Many people use hair dryers to evaporate dew from optics, but it seems to me that this wastes a lot of energy heating the air. I would think that a strong source of infrared light (ideally battery powered) would be more energy efficient. Is anyone aware of a product that would be suitable for this?

July 30, 2010 05:47 AM Forum: Telescope Making

Wax bearings?

Posted By Dick Jacobson

Since teflon/Ebony Star bearings need to be waxed for optimum performance, has anyone tried using blocks of wax for bearings?

September 26, 2010 07:14 PM Forum: Reflectors

Periscopes on Newtonians eliminate ladders

Posted By Dick Jacobson

To lower the eyepiece height on my 20" Newtonian, I built a periscope attachment and am currently testing it. The optical quality appears to be excellent.

The top end of the periscope is inserted into the Newtonian's focuser and the eyepiece is inserted into the bottom end a few feet lower. The optics consist of a pair of diagonal mirrors at the top and bottom, and a pair of positive lenses between the mirrors. The upper lens makes the light rays parallel, like an eyepiece, and the lower lens re-focuses them.

For the upper lens I used a 300 mm telephoto. The front of the lens faces downwards so the light goes through the lens "backwards". I attached a 1.25" prism diagonal to the back end of the telephoto. The other side of the diagonal is inserted into the Newtonian's focuser. The lower lens is a complete 80 mm refractor with a focal length of 500 mm.

To support the optics I used a 5" diameter aluminum tube with a 1" square aluminum tube fastened to its side. The telephoto and the upper end of the refractor are mounted in the 5" tube. The lower end of the refractor is attached to the 1" square tube. The bottom end of the square tube is attached to the mirror box of the Newtonian.

I've done quite a bit of "eyeball" testing of the periscope this summer. I don't have any images or other measurements. As far as I can tell, the periscope does not introduce any additional coma or astigmatism, except that if the optics are badly misaligned the star images become astigmatic. The field appears to be perfectly flat. There is a small amount of false color on bright planets and the brightest stars. I believe this is caused by the prism diagonal at the top. I plan to replace this diagonal with a dielectric mirror diagonal. There is a noticeable loss of light, maybe 20-30 percent, which I was expecting because the telephoto is a little smaller than it should be and is over 30 years old so the coatings are probably not up to modern standards. To avoid loss of light the upper lens should be at least as "fast" (low focal ratio) as the main mirror. My mirror is f/4.5 and the telephoto is labeled as f/4.5 but the front lens is too small for this ratio so the actual speed appears to be about 4.7. With multicoated lenses of the proper size and dielectric mirrors you should be able to limit the light loss to 2 or 3 percent.

The optics seem to be very forgiving of misalignment. If not aligned correctly, you will lose some light and may not see the entire field, but other distortions do not appear until the misalignment is extreme. The telephoto is held in the tube with six screws, much like a finder scope, and the front end of the refractor is positioned with three screws, so it is easy to make precise adjustments. It is possible to get pretty good alignment simply by "eyeballing" through the refractor, and a laser collimator can be used to improve on this.

Since the lenses that I used were of different focal lengths (300 mm at the top and 500 mm at the bottom), there is increased magnification by that ratio and consequently a smaller field of view. If you wanted to maintain the full field of view you could use lenses of equal focal length, but large fast lenses tend to be expensive. Several manufacturers make 300 mm f/4 prime (non-zoom) camera lenses and these cost around $1100 new but I've seen a lot of used ones advertised for around $400. I think these would work well with most telescopes. Possibly an objective from a binocular or spotting scope or a finder scope could be used, but I'm not sure whether the optical quality would be adequate.

You should be able to fit a periscope onto almost any large Newtonian with minor modifications. My periscope weighs about 15 lbs. so the main scope needs to be re-balanced. Another consideration is that the focal plane has to be far enough out to meet the periscope's focus. You will need to provide an attachment point on the mirror box for the bottom of the periscope.

One interesting benefit is that images are erect and correct, not mirror reversed. I mounted a 1x finder and a RACI (right-angle correct image) finder on the periscope, so the views through all three are in the same direction, a great benefit for star hopping. Since you use a diagonal at the eyepiece, you can rotate it to provide a comfortable viewing position. You don't need an adjustable chair. If the length of the periscope is set to provide standing-height viewing at zenith, all you need is a 24" stool for the lower elevations.

It is easy to tailor the length of the periscope to provide exactly the eyepiece height you want. Moving the refractor up and down doesn't change the view until you reach a limit where the field of view starts to narrow. The maximum length of the periscope depends on the diameter of the optics. As an example, my periscope has a 64 mm diameter upper lens and 80 mm lower lens. I want to maintain a 46 mm diameter field at the eyepiece. Picture a light ray traveling from the top edge of the upper lens, through the center of the lower lens, and hitting the bottom edge of the focal plane. In my case the maximum separation of the lenses works out to 500 / 23 x 32 = 696 mm or about 28". At this separation there will be a "soft" edge of the image at the point 23 mm from the optical axis. Add to this about 10" for the length of the telephoto plus diagonal and 17" for the refractor, and the total length of the periscope can be up to 55", measured from the upper to the lower eyepiece locations. With larger optics it could be much longer.

Given the excellent performance of my periscope using off-the-shelf optics, I am convinced that it is possible to build periscopes that would satisfy the most demanding observers. When periscopes become commonplace and eliminate ladders, giant Newtonians should become a lot more popular.

The photo below shows the upper part of the periscope attached to my 20" Newtonian. If anyone is interested, I will post more details in the Telescope Making forum.

February 10, 2011 06:08 AM Forum: Telescope Making

Re: Tube source for 12.5" mirror?

Posted By Dick Jacobson

Drum shells? It seems to me that a series of unfinished snare drum shells attached end-to-end would make a very strong tube. I've heard of people using drum shells for secondary cages. This is just an idea and I haven't tried it.

February 17, 2012 06:50 AM Forum: Deep Sky Observing

What are your most unforgettable telescopic sights

Posted By Dick Jacobson

What telescopic (or binocular) views have been most unforgettable for you? I'll start off as follows.

The first time I saw a globular cluster resolved into stars.

My first view of the Orion Nebula through a big (10") scope.

M11, every time I look at it.

The Andromeda Galaxy through 100mm binoculars from a really dark site.

A glimpse of the jet emerging from M87.

Comet Holmes shortly after it erupted.

Comet Garradd and M71 in the same field in a 100-degree eyepiece.

November 6, 2012 06:37 AM Forum: Telescope Making

Re: dew sheild lining

Posted By Dick Jacobson

I think that Protostar flockboard or flocked paper would make a great liner for dew shields. Maybe the entire shield could be made by rolling up a piece of heavy weight flockboard. I have used the heavy flockboard and it is much darker than ultra-flat black "camouflage" paint. See http://www.fpi-protostar.com/flockboard.htm

February 10, 2003 11:47 AM Forum: Telescope Making

Rotating Tube Rings

Posted By Dick Jacobson

Rockler woodworking stores sell a ball-bearing Lazy Susan turntable with an inside diameter just shy of 15" for $55. This is a continuous ring, not split. It's very solidly constructed and weighs 3 1/2 lbs. I bought one and am planning to use it to construct a rotating eyepiece section on my 14" Newtonian.

Also on the subject of rings, I'm starting work on a 20" equatorial mounted truss tube scope with a rotating upper cage. I built a ring roller and have been bending a piece of 3/4 x 1/8 inch aluminum angle into a 24" diameter ring (it's a lot of work!)