South Dakota Republican Senator Mike Rounds Vs TrumpPosted By Jim Moscheck |
Mass delusion is all that I can come up with.
South Dakota Republican Senator Mike Rounds Vs TrumpPosted By Jim Moscheck |
Filibuster question.Posted By Jim Moscheck |
Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
As far as carving out the filibuster, the most recent case was back in 2017 when "then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., eliminated the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees, clearing the way for then-President Donald Trump's first nominee to be confirmed."
Additionally, for an unbiased review of the filibuster:
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/senate-filibuster-calls-change-voting-rights/story?id=82186354
Orgy of PsychodramaPosted By Jim Moscheck |
Orgy of PsychodramaPosted By Jim Moscheck |
Didn't mention the "Hang Mike Pence" chants. Guess that doesn't count, huh?Originally Posted by Mel MakiNothing specific?
Orgy of PsychodramaPosted By Jim Moscheck |
Didn't mention the "Hang Mike Pence" chants. Guess that doesn't count, huh?Originally Posted by Mel MakiNothing specific?
Jan 6th Perps Charged With Sedition!Posted By Jim Moscheck |
Jan 6th Perps Charged With Sedition!Posted By Jim Moscheck |
Jan 6th Perps Charged With Sedition!Posted By Jim Moscheck |
Jan 6th Perps Charged With Sedition!Posted By Jim Moscheck |
It doesn’t matter, they could be tried, convicted, and sentenced and Rich and Co. won’t believe it since they confuse their hero Tucker’s (isn’t that the name you give a little Scottish terrier) opinions as facts. These guys eat it up and don’t know the difference. It wasn’t a insurrection, it wasn’t sedition. Now that they’ve been indicted for sedition they’ll move the goalposts again and I’m sure they come up with more excuses why it wasn’t. Too bad Rich wasn’t on the Grand Jury so he could have set them straight.Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
Lol! Tucker Carlson, whom a judge had this to say: "Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "
"She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye
Obviously, any reasonable viewer doesn't include Rich. And I'm sure some con would find this guy credible, too:
https://nypost.com/2021/01/19/cop-allegedly-caught-lying-about-being-at-us-capitol-riot/
Or this guy:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/dea-agent-arrested-accused-of-lying-about-role-in-jan-6-capitol-riot/2021/07/20/ae5b8960-e976-11eb-8950-
d73b3e93ff7f_story.html
Or this guy:
https://theintercept.com/2022/01/03/capitol-riot-january-6-proud-boys-fbi/
Jan 6th Perps Charged With Sedition!Posted By Jim Moscheck |
Really? You think about committing multiple crimes every month? Which ones?Originally Posted by Richard Davis
Dang, if we were guilty of simply thinking things, I'd have been in jail for multiple crimes each and every month.
I mean how many of us have seen a really hot looking woman out at the coffee shop and thought some sort of un-pure thought.......