Stellacam II first lightPosted By Ron Hranac |
I finally made the plunge and acquired a Stellacam II. For those of you unfamiliar with this astro gadget, it's essentially an electronic eyepiece--specifically a black & white real-time imaging device. It comes with a 1.25-inch adapter so it can be used like an eyepiece. Instead of looking through an eyepiece, though, the Stellacam II is connected to an external video monitor. It's capable of providing a live video feed, or stacking individual video frames--anywhere from 1 to 256--for improved performance with deep sky objects. The Stellacam II is said to be ideal for DSOs, but is not recommended for bright planets or the moon.
I connected the Stellacam II to an external Sony 9-inch B&W video monitor.
First light was Jupiter (OK, I'm not real good about following directions), and I had the best results with a Tele Vue 5x Powermate between the Stellacam II and the scope's diagonal. This dimmed Jupiter's image sufficiently to still be able to set the frame stack control to between 1 and 4 frames (I played with this a bit along with gain and gamma), and provided enough magnification to see a surprising amount of surface detail on the external monitor. The scope was a Tak TOA-130. So much for not being recommended for planets. I found it to work quite well.
Second light was a daytime view of the sun through a 60mm H-alpha scope and a neutral density filter. I couldn't see any surface detail on the sun, but tweaking gain and gamma (with the stack control set to off or 1) showed silouettes of prominances on the sun's limb. OK, the Stellacam II worked here, but not as well as I'd hoped.
Back to the night sky.
With the Stellacam II connected to the TOA-130, the combo provided impressive images on the monitor of globular clusters (M3 & M13), the Ring Nebula, and the Whirlpool Galaxy. I was surprised at the amount of detail visible in the galaxy image. It rivaled some pictures I've seen. My wife even came outside to take a look at the monitor, commenting that the spiral arms looked like a "cinnamon roll."
For all of these DSOs, I had the stack control set to 256 frames, gain about mid-position, and I played with the gamma control switch (usually set to the middle position).
All of these views were from the driveway in front of my house. Denver's light polluted skies didn't seem to be a major factor, and for most of the objects I left the porch light on. There was no moonlight (new moon or nearly so), so that could prove to be an issue later.
This coming weekend I'm going to take the Stellacam II to the Denver Astronomical Society's June open house. It seems ideal for astronomy outreach, and will allow folks to see objects that otherwise couldn't be seen, especially from Denver's light polluted skies. I'll also see how the Stellacam II does with first quarter moon, likely with a neutral density filter.
Downsides? Cost is one--the Stellacam II sells for around $800. 8O It also has a handful of hot pixels, which show up as "stars" on the monitor (when in stack mode). This isn't a major distraction, but it does put a half dozen or so new stars in the image along with whatever is being viewed.
Ron
I connected the Stellacam II to an external Sony 9-inch B&W video monitor.
First light was Jupiter (OK, I'm not real good about following directions), and I had the best results with a Tele Vue 5x Powermate between the Stellacam II and the scope's diagonal. This dimmed Jupiter's image sufficiently to still be able to set the frame stack control to between 1 and 4 frames (I played with this a bit along with gain and gamma), and provided enough magnification to see a surprising amount of surface detail on the external monitor. The scope was a Tak TOA-130. So much for not being recommended for planets. I found it to work quite well.
Second light was a daytime view of the sun through a 60mm H-alpha scope and a neutral density filter. I couldn't see any surface detail on the sun, but tweaking gain and gamma (with the stack control set to off or 1) showed silouettes of prominances on the sun's limb. OK, the Stellacam II worked here, but not as well as I'd hoped.
Back to the night sky.
With the Stellacam II connected to the TOA-130, the combo provided impressive images on the monitor of globular clusters (M3 & M13), the Ring Nebula, and the Whirlpool Galaxy. I was surprised at the amount of detail visible in the galaxy image. It rivaled some pictures I've seen. My wife even came outside to take a look at the monitor, commenting that the spiral arms looked like a "cinnamon roll."

For all of these DSOs, I had the stack control set to 256 frames, gain about mid-position, and I played with the gamma control switch (usually set to the middle position).
All of these views were from the driveway in front of my house. Denver's light polluted skies didn't seem to be a major factor, and for most of the objects I left the porch light on. There was no moonlight (new moon or nearly so), so that could prove to be an issue later.
This coming weekend I'm going to take the Stellacam II to the Denver Astronomical Society's June open house. It seems ideal for astronomy outreach, and will allow folks to see objects that otherwise couldn't be seen, especially from Denver's light polluted skies. I'll also see how the Stellacam II does with first quarter moon, likely with a neutral density filter.
Downsides? Cost is one--the Stellacam II sells for around $800. 8O It also has a handful of hot pixels, which show up as "stars" on the monitor (when in stack mode). This isn't a major distraction, but it does put a half dozen or so new stars in the image along with whatever is being viewed.

Ron