Of the various DSC computers, is there a real difference in how easy they are to perform alignment, and how sophisticated the alignment model is.
For example, with a very rough polar alignment, my G11/Gemini doesn't need the initial OTA aim to be precise, but the Argo Navis manual says that the OTA should initially be accurately aimed to be perpendicular to the polar axis or accuracy will suffer.
Among them, are any notably better at developing an accurate pointing model that includes real-world imperfections in the mount such as non-orthogonality and backlash over the meridian?
Finally are there computer-based (either hand-held or laptop) solutions that are better?
I look forward to your replies. Thanks.
Allen
For example, with a very rough polar alignment, my G11/Gemini doesn't need the initial OTA aim to be precise, but the Argo Navis manual says that the OTA should initially be accurately aimed to be perpendicular to the polar axis or accuracy will suffer.
Among them, are any notably better at developing an accurate pointing model that includes real-world imperfections in the mount such as non-orthogonality and backlash over the meridian?
Finally are there computer-based (either hand-held or laptop) solutions that are better?
I look forward to your replies. Thanks.
Allen