Am using a recently acquired Cheshire e.p. and a Laser collimator to align an 8" Discovery PDHQ. They appear to disagree on the secondary tilt setting. When the Cheshire says tilt is correct (full reflection of primary in secondary), the laser hits primary about an inch above the center spot.
When secondary tilt is adjusted so laser hits in middle of center spot, the primary reflection's 10:30 quadrant is truncated in the Cheshire image. In fact, you notice the truncation just looking into the focuser without the Cheshire.
Laser collimation appears to be on; it's a little sloppy in the focuser but very consistent once set screw is tightened. Tried shimming with scotch tape and got the same result. Also tried different 1.25" adapter and got the same results. Spent some time trying to improve centering of secondary under focuser...it didn't seem to help any.
It's cloudy here and will be for awhile; otherwise I'd just trot the thing outside and see which alignment is better. I'm new to Newts. Is my procedure right? Any ideas?
Bob
When secondary tilt is adjusted so laser hits in middle of center spot, the primary reflection's 10:30 quadrant is truncated in the Cheshire image. In fact, you notice the truncation just looking into the focuser without the Cheshire.
Laser collimation appears to be on; it's a little sloppy in the focuser but very consistent once set screw is tightened. Tried shimming with scotch tape and got the same result. Also tried different 1.25" adapter and got the same results. Spent some time trying to improve centering of secondary under focuser...it didn't seem to help any.
It's cloudy here and will be for awhile; otherwise I'd just trot the thing outside and see which alignment is better. I'm new to Newts. Is my procedure right? Any ideas?
Bob
