At what focal length is it no longer practical to stay with 1 1/2" eyepieces in favor of 2" eyepieces? I have read that at some point you are just looking at the insides of the eyepiece barrel unless you move up to 2". Also, what is the influence of advertised FOV in respect to this decision?
I have a Meade Series 500 40mm plossl which came with the used scope I purchased (f/10 C9.25). The difficulty seeing anything with this eyepiece unless I am dead center with my head in a vise makes this piece just about worthless to me. The next nearest focal length I have is the Celestron silver top 25mm plossl. Without trying someone else's eyepieces in my scope I'm fearful that something like a Meade 32mm SP or Celestron 30mm Ultima may prove a dissapointment when I should really be considering something like the 2" Meade 32mm SW or other similar eyepieces.
Can one really get good 32mm performance with 1 1/2" eyepieces or is this pushing the limit?
I have a Meade Series 500 40mm plossl which came with the used scope I purchased (f/10 C9.25). The difficulty seeing anything with this eyepiece unless I am dead center with my head in a vise makes this piece just about worthless to me. The next nearest focal length I have is the Celestron silver top 25mm plossl. Without trying someone else's eyepieces in my scope I'm fearful that something like a Meade 32mm SP or Celestron 30mm Ultima may prove a dissapointment when I should really be considering something like the 2" Meade 32mm SW or other similar eyepieces.
Can one really get good 32mm performance with 1 1/2" eyepieces or is this pushing the limit?