Hi Mark,
Expensive EPs are worth their price and always give you the best view that your scope has to offer. But, the scope must be able to give you an image that is worthy of the expensive EP or the expense of the EP might not make that the difference in cost worthwhile.
I think that having 3 good EPs could be all that a person would have to have, if they were matched to the scope you use.
However, I would also say that if money is tight, then $400-700 for an EP would be better spent on a better scope with a step down in EP expense. Or after the better scope you buy one good EP a year until you have both a good scope and good EPs to go with it.
Now I am not saying that the Hardin is not a fair scope, I have used a couple of them and they were OK. So please do not think I am being an elitist, I am just being a realist and realize that the image from the Hardin 10" scopes that I have used were fine in EPs costing 1/2 that of say a Nagler and that a Nagler did not improve the image that much. Hope my meaning is clear as I am not trying to talk down your scope, but trying to explain the situation.
Expensive EPs are worth their price and always give you the best view that your scope has to offer. But, the scope must be able to give you an image that is worthy of the expensive EP or the expense of the EP might not make that the difference in cost worthwhile.
I think that having 3 good EPs could be all that a person would have to have, if they were matched to the scope you use.
However, I would also say that if money is tight, then $400-700 for an EP would be better spent on a better scope with a step down in EP expense. Or after the better scope you buy one good EP a year until you have both a good scope and good EPs to go with it.
Now I am not saying that the Hardin is not a fair scope, I have used a couple of them and they were OK. So please do not think I am being an elitist, I am just being a realist and realize that the image from the Hardin 10" scopes that I have used were fine in EPs costing 1/2 that of say a Nagler and that a Nagler did not improve the image that much. Hope my meaning is clear as I am not trying to talk down your scope, but trying to explain the situation.
[SIZE="Large"][/SIZE][COLOR="Blue"][/COLOR] Floyd Blue
Amateur Imager