Image of the day

Captured by
Ralph Ford

M31 with Redcat 51

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Next Eyepiece for Meade 12 LX200

Started by lawjbm, 11/01/2003 07:40PM
Posted 11/01/2003 07:40PM Opening Post
Hello all. I sold my Meade Super Plossls that I purchased with the Meade 12 LX200 I recently purchased. I bought a 22mm Nagler. I was a bit uncertain about selling the Meades. They were nice eyepieces. I only have had one opportunity to try the Nagler, but it was totally worth it. Really quite amazing. The Meades were like Toyotas or Hondas--very good quality, better than Fords and Chevys, but the Nagler is like a fine luxury auto. It was great to look at Saturn.

I would like to get another Nagler. I was looking for some advice. The 22mm Nagler gives me 138x. I was thinking of a 17mm Nagler (179x) or a 16mm Nagler (190x). Is the 17mm Nagler a big enough jump in power that it is worth it? The 16mm? I also was thinking of skipping this middle range and getting a 14mm Meade UWA or 13mm Nagler. These would provide higher powers and probably less "usability" here in central Maine. I had tried a UO ortho 18mm and sent it back. I felt it was equal or lesser to the Meade Super Plossls of 15mm and 20mm.

I would appreciate any suggestions, especially in terms of how often I will be able to use powers approaching 200x or more.

I also thought of a 15mm Panoptic as a compromise.

I do general viewing. I would like to be able to use my eyepieces on deep sky stuff and the planets.

Finally, I was thinking of getting a high powered plossl or UO ortho to check collimation. Is this a good idea?

Thanx.

Gregg
Augusta, Maine
Posted 11/01/2003 08:08PM #1
Gregg,
I am glad you have discovered the benifit of great EPs. The cost is high but the rewards are great.
I feel that the 12mm-13mm Nagler might be your better bet for the next step. I have the 17mm and the 20mm Nagler and they are pretty close together.
The 14mm Meade UWA is another fine choice. That is the one UWA that I don't have as yet, but would like to have.
If you have a barlow, use that with an EP for collimation and it would do fine.
Naglers and the UWAs are better corrected than the Panoptic and are a better value in my opinion.
I think your pushing 200X and more should be very often, but of course the viewing conditions would be the limmiting factor.
I use up to 400X with my 15" DOB and sometimes that high with my 8" SCT. I use over 200X all the time on both.
I have a few Naglers and UWA Meades that work very nicely.
My EPs are as follow,
31mm Nagler-20mm Nagler-17mm Nagler-12mm Nagler-8.8mm UWA-6.7mm UWA-4.7mm UWA-14mm XL Russell(Pentax Lenses)-15mm Orion Ultrascopic-40mm&32mm Celestron Plossl, 26mm Meade Plossl, 2X Big Barlow 2", 2X Celestron barlow.
Some are for star parties and some for personal use. I use the Naglers for my self and the plossl at the star parties to avoid fingers and eyelashes. ;^)

Floyd

[SIZE="Large"][/SIZE][COLOR="Blue"][/COLOR] Floyd Blue grin
Amateur Imager