Vixen actually came in ahead of the wave in the fast, not hugely expensive apo class with the ED102SS f/6.5, which was discontinued because the manufacturing process involved lead.
This little scope is dear to my heart because I own one. It's an ED doublet to be exact. In any case, after only a few years Vixen had to discontinue the line due to environmental factors that were apparently related to lead. They then moved to f/7.7, f/8, around there. Given that "the market" continues to abound in f/7-point-O's, they undoubtedly had a reason for this choice.
My question is: why does "getting the lead out" make for a somewhat slower scope?
In all the many learned debates about fluorites and FPLs and such I never see hide nor hair of lead. Personally I think of lead as kinda-not-very transparent, you know, Superman can't see through it, and stuff.
thanks
Greg N
This little scope is dear to my heart because I own one. It's an ED doublet to be exact. In any case, after only a few years Vixen had to discontinue the line due to environmental factors that were apparently related to lead. They then moved to f/7.7, f/8, around there. Given that "the market" continues to abound in f/7-point-O's, they undoubtedly had a reason for this choice.
My question is: why does "getting the lead out" make for a somewhat slower scope?
In all the many learned debates about fluorites and FPLs and such I never see hide nor hair of lead. Personally I think of lead as kinda-not-very transparent, you know, Superman can't see through it, and stuff.
thanks
Greg N
"Scope will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no scope." --Freewheelin' Franklin
