Image of the day

Captured by
John Roach

Enhanced Uranus showing Polar Cap and possible Aurora

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Best 10mm EP for Deep Sky Observing?

Started by jjacobso, 06/02/2003 06:55AM
Posted 06/02/2003 06:55AM Opening Post
Although my EP collection is rounding out quite nicely these days, the one focal length that I am sorely missing is a good, sharp, 10mm EP with good light throughput. My current 10mm EP is a simple 4-element plossl which has good throughput, but not the best contrast/sharpness/eye-relief/fov.

I really would like something with a decent fov and better eye-relief, but since my primary deepsky scope is an 8" newtonian, light-throughput is very important to me, so Televues are out of the question.

I recently borrowed another observer's Pentax XL 10mm, which had fantastic light throughput, and a nice fov. The Pentax is a bit more than I wish to spend at the moment. So I am basically looking for something with a similar FOV, that is sharp, and has similar light-throughput. I am certainly willing to sacrifice off-axis sharpness in exchange for better light-throughput.

I have used a 10mm speers-waler in a different scope than mine (15" dob), and remember it as being quite impressive in all areas, but since I was using it in a larger scope, I can't really judge the light throughput. My understanding is that it is a 7-element design.

Does anyone have experience on how the speers-waler compares to the Pentax regarding light-throuput? Are there any other good candidates for a 10mm deepsky eyepiece in the under $200 category?

The other one I am interested in is the new Apogee widescan 9mm - but I know absolutely nothing about the performance of this eyepiece.

-Jake
Posted 06/02/2003 10:29AM #1
10mm radian. 9mm UO ortho. 8.8mm Meade UWA.

The best deepsky eyepiece I have in that range is the Meade 8.8mm UWA. It provides 12% more mag than the 10mm radian and about a 40% greater Tfov. (Correction = It has 40% greater Afov BUT provides about 22%-23% greater Tfov than the radian). Sees much more than the 10mm radian (because of the aditional magnification) and is absolutely pinpoint sharp right off the edge.

On planets the UO9mm is better.

The UWAs and the Radians sell for the same prices 240$new or $180used.

edz
Posted 06/02/2003 03:47PM #2
What's your Newtonian's focal ratio? Would this eyepiece be "dedicated" to this scope, or would you be looking for maximum performance with other scopes, too?

Cheers.
-Dan
Posted 06/03/2003 04:53AM #3
Jake,

IMO, you're being overly concerned about light throughput. The 9mm Nagler type 6, although outside of your price range, is a fantastic deep-sky AND planetary ocular. I routinely use my 9mm with my 101mm Tele Vue refractor and two 80mm achromats.

I've used a 10mm Speers-Waler on a couple of occasions. Aside from its length and issues with coming to focus in some telescopes it performs rather well.

The 10mm Pentax is very good and is probably your best overall option.

Dave Mitsky

Chance favors the prepared mind.

De gustibus non est disputandum.