Steven,
I don't have right or left eye dominance, and I had cataracts in both eyes. Finally, two years ago at age 59, I had cataract surgery on my left eye, which was the worst, and it made all the difference in the world. Now I use it almost exclusively at the eyepiece. I second what John says about the difference in color, and the rapidity with which I recovered. The procedure itself is almost a non-event -- nothing like it was for you father in the 70s. I was in the OR maybe 20 minutes, max, and the procedure itself took maybe 10 minutes, with no discomfort beyond my initial anxiety. Two days after surgery I had a followup exam, and measured 20-20. About six months later, there was a slight growth of protein between the prosthetic lens and the lens sack, which occurs about 1/3 to 1/2 the time in most patients. They deal with that with laser surgery which burns a clear hole thru the sack without damaging the new lens or the inner eye.
Curiously, as I bring my eyes down on an eyepiece that's focused on a bright extended object, such as a planet, I can see the cataract in my right eye, or the hole thru the lens sack in my left eye, reflected in the eyepiece. For me, cataracts are more like an occlusion rather than a blurring. Across the field of view there's a discontinuity rather like looking at a broken mirror. Images in my "bionic" eye are sharp, however. Given everything, cataract surgery, while not restoring my vision to pristine, youthful quality, was a very good choice. I'm looking at having the other one done soon.
A retired optometrist friend of mine told me the only bad news in all this is that as a natural consequence of aging and exposure to UV, sooner or later everyone will develop cataracts if they live long enough. Given that, I believe it's better to have them corrected while your health is good and your chances for improved quality of life are high.