Image of the day

Captured by
Douglas Rollain

SH2-157_Seestar_S30_Pro

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

My Response To Space Shuttle Critics

Started by Glasstronomic, 02/06/2003 08:39PM
Posted 02/06/2003 08:39PM Opening Post
Let me preface my comments below by heartily agreeing with the folks who have cited the Hubble Space Telescope as one of mankind's most important scientific instruments ever, and how the STS program is integral to its continued success. I'd also like to nod to those who correctly point out that the STS and ISS programs are already serving valuable purpose in the quest for interplanetary travel, which mass media seems to be crying for as the "new" focus of the space program. Now, on to the meat of the matter.

TO THOSE WHO WOULD RETIRE THE SPACE SHUTTLE FLEET

It really irritates me how fast the fingers start pointing when we suffer a national tragedy like Columbia. So many folks are attacking NASA management and engineering, while there is a considerable lack of funding, which is rationed by Congress and the White House. I believe that every single person within NASA who was responsible for the flight readiness of Columbia did everything within their power to maintain a safe ship. It's not their fault that it costs millions more than is available to do all the jobs that must be done, so they must prioritize each, as we all do in life. And, even then, no one can think of every possible future failure. Money to burn wouldn't make a gang of geniuses infallible.

I was not surprised to find out that the Clinton budget hid drastic cuts in the STS program by combining its bookkeeping with the ISS program. In former astronaut Jerry M. Linenger’s book "Off The Planet", he shows how the former Mir program was being used to filter US dollars into the Russian economy without labeling it "foreign aid" and inciting popular opposition. Now they use the ISS program. I don't oppose keeping the world's nuclear powers stable with US aid, but I have a problem with deception that uses my beloved space program dollars to line the pockets of Russian officials, who intercept this "payment" for Russian ISS hardware that never materializes. Maybe if the aid wasn’t such a secret, they'd have a harder time stealing it from the economic/industrial infrastructure that it is intended to rebuild.

That money could be better spent on proper maintenance of what I still consider to be mankind's finest machines, doing the work that our curious nature and national strength demand. Many people who want to mothball the STS fleet apparently have no clue that it does our bidding in space like no other machines in existence can. They don't realize that the next generation of reusable space vehicles has been in development for over twenty years and requires at least another ten to come to fruition as the safe, effective vehicle system that they are demanding right now. It's a typical American stereotype at its worst; to Hell with realistic expectations, we want instant gratification!

(continued...)
Posted 02/06/2003 08:40PM #1
TO THOSE WHO WOULD RETIRE THE SPACE SHUTTLE FLEET
(continued...)

To those who cite the retired NASA engineer who wrote a letter to the president last year, begging him to ground the fleet and upgrade hardware, consider the following. Would you stop driving your car to work tomorrow because an ex- automotive engineer made broad, sweeping generalizations that your top-of-the-line vehicle is too old to drive to work safely without rebuilding it from the ground up, even though you've changed its oil every 3000 miles, performed regular tune-ups, and it seems to be running fine? How about if your car cost billions of dollars to build, hundreds of millions to repair, tens of millions to operate, and your boss demands that you be at work on time or the whole company will fail and you'll be responsible for putting thousands of good people out of work? I'll bet you'd turn that key in the morning.

Those who lack the vision and desire to explore and discover, and those who won't accept reasonable risks of life and limb for those concepts, should consider the unique abilities of the STS to deploy, retrieve, and service crucial on-orbit military hardware, which is a national necessity. The intelligence gathering satellites alone have spared countless American lives that would be lost on battlefields around the globe, by allowing precision troop movements and weapons system deployments and by allowing our leaders to avoid conflicts caused by misinformation altogether. Should we retire our aircraft carrier fleet because several dozen Naval aircrewmen are killed per year during routine peacetime duty? I think not. We mourn their loss but know the cause is worth the price. Think about our millions of sons and daughters in uniform before you cry out that the fleet must be retired because we can't afford to let another seven souls bravely put their lives on the line to experience their dreams, and ours, while serving us all.

Lots of folks here in America have adopted the attitude that spaceflight is a routine, mundane part of modern life. They fail to understand that space travel is and always will be the most dangerous of endeavors, executed by the most brilliant minds, who understand and accept the inherent risks of their calling. It does and always will yield rewards for all of humanity, tenfold the lives lost by accident.

If NASA deemed the next shuttle ready for flight tomorrow and invited me aboard, I would gleefully don a pressure suit and strap in for the ride of my life. If it were to carry me to my doom, I would fly to the angels singing praise that the Lord gifted humanity with the ability to create those magnificent machines that lift His finest people beyond the wild blue.

Sincerely,
Jason G. Glass