Since today is Earth Day or something, I have an ecological question. Should we be making extraordinary attempts to save paper?
While it is certainly useful to recycle paper so that we get the most value from it during its lifecycle, I'm not sure that we should wholeheartedly embrace going paperless.
Paper gives economic value to forests. If landowners could not grow trees and sell them to make paper, they might find it more profitable to sell their land to developers who might eliminate the forest in order to build golf courses and retirement communities. By killing trees for paper, I think we might ultimately be saving forests.
While it is certainly useful to recycle paper so that we get the most value from it during its lifecycle, I'm not sure that we should wholeheartedly embrace going paperless.
Paper gives economic value to forests. If landowners could not grow trees and sell them to make paper, they might find it more profitable to sell their land to developers who might eliminate the forest in order to build golf courses and retirement communities. By killing trees for paper, I think we might ultimately be saving forests.
[SIZE="Small"]------------
I have several telescopes, but none are semi-APO, APO, or in anyway valuable.
[/SIZE]