Just out of curiosity, we get a relatively balanced covering of the Iraq crisis here in the European media, with thorough analysis on what the real reasons could be for an attack on Iraq (last night a rather shocking documentary on the background of GWB, and the cash flow from oil gigants towards his campaign, amongst other things like the very doubtful selling of stock with pre-knowledge
as an auditor of the company - investigated, but investigated by what seem to be close friends of GWB). Also the motivation behind the viewpoint of Blair, historic reasons why he acts the way he acts etc.
How do the media cover all this in the US? Do you get this kind of balanced analysis as well? If not, it could lead to a biased public opinion.
I watch CNN regularly, but hardly hear anything about it on that channel.
D.
as an auditor of the company - investigated, but investigated by what seem to be close friends of GWB). Also the motivation behind the viewpoint of Blair, historic reasons why he acts the way he acts etc.
How do the media cover all this in the US? Do you get this kind of balanced analysis as well? If not, it could lead to a biased public opinion.
I watch CNN regularly, but hardly hear anything about it on that channel.
D.