Ok, so now they're saying the Saudi who took the video did so co-incidentally. I guess that's the best-case scenario...Originally Posted by Rod KaufmanYep, the contagion did spread, 1-2 of the shooter's Saudi buddies actually filmed the attack...
Rod, I wonder if this might possibly be considered a "hate crime" as well, as if that designation makes it somehow worse than if he randomly murders a few people?Originally Posted by Rod KaufmanThe FBI now "Presumes" the attack was one of terror. As we know from the impeachment hearings, a presumption doesn't count...
https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/08/us/pensacola-naval-station-shooting-sunday/index.html
Darian, that would be a presumption on your part too. Maybe he was just venting. So what if he had extreme anti-American views. So do a lot of people in the middle east. And some of them have sensitive feelings with strong religious beliefs. That doesn't make them guilty of hate crimes. Maybe the shooter just went a little funny in the head and then he did what he did. If you look at the impeachment hearings wherein Sondland said there was a quid pro quo but it was pointed out by an observant Republican that the Ambassador merely presumed Trump and the three Amigos were all in on it together like they were thick as thieves or something. What would an Ambassador know about it, anyway? He was just presuming...Originally Posted by Darian Rachal
Rod, I wonder if this might possibly be considered a "hate crime" as well, as if that designation makes it somehow worse than if he randomly murders a few people?
Rod, I was being a bit sarcastic. The idea of a "hate crime" is something dreamed by **** on the Left; the idea that killing a black person because one dislikes blacks is somehow worse than premeditated murder for other reasons.Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
Darian, that would be a presumption on your part too. Maybe he was just venting. So what if he had extreme anti-American views. So do a lot of people in the middle east. And some of them have sensitive feelings with strong religious beliefs. That doesn't make them guilty of hate crimes. Maybe the shooter just went a little funny in the head and then he did what he did. If you look at the impeachment hearings wherein Sondland said there was a quid pro quo but it was pointed out by an observant Republican that the Ambassador merely presumed Trump and the three Amigos were all in on it together like they were thick as thieves or something. What would an Ambassador know about it, anyway? He was just presuming...
Darian, I was being a bit more sarcastic too. The idea that the FBI can't "presume" this wasn't a terrorist attack because of the lack of direct evidence(ie the bastard didn't scream aku akbar or allegiance to ISIS) but instead relied on his anti-American rantings and drawing a parallel with the impeachment hearings wherein the Ambassador presumes there's a quid pro quo rather than thinking Trump and the three Amigos were getting it together in the Ukraine for a few beers instead...Originally Posted by Darian Rachal
Rod, I was being a bit sarcastic. The idea of a "hate crime" is something dreamed by **** on the Left; the idea that killing a black person because one dislikes blacks is somehow worse than premeditated murder for other reasons.
Originally Posted by Richard Davis
Wow, you're really stuck on this "presumption" word aren't you Rod? Is everything in every news Story somehow related to Impeachement with you? Sounds like you really are obsessed with it, to be so preoccupied with impeachment that you can't get it off your mind.
Must really bother you that you can't even have a conversation about other news without relating it to impeachment. Take some TDS pills, they might help!
