The DEFINITIVE Recommendation by "Dr" Anthony Fauci Regarding Masks.

Started by richartisticwoods, 07/28/2021 10:44PM
Posted 07/28/2021 10:44PM | Edited 07/28/2021 10:55PM Opening Post
Here is some real cocksure recommendations from "Dr" Anthony Fauci.

He is positive that masks work.... er don't work.... er Work.  cwy

Yep, for SURE they work..... er maybe not?  ermm

https://news.grabien.com/story-montage-fauci-gives-every-possible-answer-masks-covid

But to all the Conservative Repubs out there who DO question bureaucrats like Anthony Fauci, the next time the Leftist Marxist Democrats here tell try to shame you by telling you that you're killing people and when the Resident Screaming Mimi of the Forum chastises you like you're some sort of child, just link him to that montage of complete insanity, coming from that leftist power hungry bureaucrat above.

It should shut their mouths!  What these clowns truly are, summed up in few words, they are smug, self-righteous virtue signalers. tongue

P.S. Don't take crap from these guys, as they haven't a clue.  Their guess is as good as yours.  wink

BTW, I do remember early on, that the left here, and at least one of the RINOs here, put up photos of themselves wearing their masks, looking for pats on the back as to how moral they were in wearing their masks, virtue signaling to the rest of us, all the while chastising the rest of us for questioning the authority.

I wonder if any of those virtue signalers is still wearing his mask at the stores and such?

After all, "The Science" IS settled now isn't it.  Masks work!  Oops, I mean Masks don't work  
Posted 07/28/2021 11:19PM | Edited 07/28/2021 11:20PM #1
Originally Posted by Richard Davis
Here is some real cocksure recommendations from "Dr" Anthony Fauci.

He is positive that masks work.... er don't work.... er Work.  cwy

Yep, for SURE they work..... er maybe not?  ermm

https://news.grabien.com/story-montage-fauci-gives-every-possible-answer-masks-covid

But to all the Conservative Repubs out there who DO question bureaucrats like Anthony Fauci, the next time the Leftist Marxist Democrats here tell try to shame you by telling you that you're killing people and when the Resident Screaming Mimi of the Forum chastises you like you're some sort of child, just link him to that montage of complete insanity, coming from that leftist power hungry bureaucrat above.

It should shut their mouths!  What these clowns truly are, summed up in few words, they are smug, self-righteous virtue signalers. tongue

P.S. Don't take crap from these guys, as they haven't a clue.  Their guess is as good as yours.  wink

BTW, I do remember early on, that the left here, and at least one of the RINOs here, put up photos of themselves wearing their masks, looking for pats on the back as to how moral they were in wearing their masks, virtue signaling to the rest of us, all the while chastising the rest of us for questioning the authority.

I wonder if any of those virtue signalers is still wearing his mask at the stores and such?

After all, "The Science" IS settled now isn't it.  Masks work!  Oops, I mean Masks don't work  
Time and accumulated data show that masks work.  Are the divergent Fauci coments date stamped?  Opinions change with the data, that's ok.  That said, I think Fauci is being very political and evasive about our funding of Wuhan gain of function research.  There's a non-sequitur that you ought to be able to sink your teeth into.  But you tend to miss all the interesting stories.

By the way, the CDC is recommending masks again, indoors, at least in states like Florida where the Delta variant is on the rise.  It is a damn shame, but entirely predictable given that so many refuse the highly effective vaccine.  Did you get vaccinated?  I can't remember.

Jim
Posted 07/28/2021 11:47PM | Edited 07/28/2021 11:48PM #2
Originally Posted by James Brown

Time and accumulated data show that masks work.  Are the divergent Fauci coments date stamped?  Opinions change with the data, that's ok.  That said, I think Fauci is being very political and evasive about our funding of Wuhan gain of function research.  There's a non-sequitur that you ought to be able to sink your teeth into.  But you tend to miss all the interesting stories.

By the way, the CDC is recommending masks again, indoors, at least in states like Florida where the Delta variant is on the rise.  It is a damn shame, but entirely predictable given that so many refuse the highly effective vaccine.  Did you get vaccinated?  I can't remember.

Jim
There have been studies that showed that not only did the mask mandate do nothing to curb the spread of the virus, but that cloth masks really don't offer any protection whatsoever.  

There have been numerous studies of course on the subject;

https://thehayride.com/2021/05/new-study-shows-mask-mandates-didnt-work/

Here is another:

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy

Here's another study coming out of Denmark, saying masks do nothing and don't work:

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/do-masks-stop-the-spread-of-covid-19-

Here is the Randomized, Controlled study by Danish Scientists who took 6000 people and tested them.  Their conclusion?  No difference in Non-mask wearers and mask wearers:

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/do-masks-stop-the-spread-of-covid-19-

From the study article:  

"Around half of those in the trial received 50 disposable surgical face masks, which they were told to change after eight hours of use. After one month, the trial participants were tested using both PCR, antibody and lateral flow tests and compared with the trial participants who did not wear a mask.

In the end, there was no statistically significant difference between those who wore masks and those who did not when it came to being infected by Covid-19. 1.8 per cent of those wearing masks caught Covid, compared to 2.1 per cent of the control group. As a result, it seems that any effect masks have on preventing the spread of the disease in the community is small".

You're free though to argue with the experts.

Now let me just point out that I offered up evidence to support my statement .  You on the other hand have offered up nothing but your mouth.

Is there anything else I can correct you on, or educate you on today? 
Posted 07/28/2021 11:58PM #3
Originally Posted by Richard Davis

There have been studies that showed that not only did the mask mandate do nothing to curb the spread of the virus, but that cloth masks really don't offer any protection whatsoever.  

There have been numerous studies of course on the subject;

https://thehayride.com/2021/05/new-study-shows-mask-mandates-didnt-work/

Here is another:

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy

Here's another study coming out of Denmark, saying masks do nothing and don't work:

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/do-masks-stop-the-spread-of-covid-19-

Here is the Randomized, Controlled study by Danish Scientists who took 6000 people and tested them.  Their conclusion?  No difference in Non-mask wearers and mask wearers:

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/do-masks-stop-the-spread-of-covid-19-

From the study article:  

"Around half of those in the trial received 50 disposable surgical face masks, which they were told to change after eight hours of use. After one month, the trial participants were tested using both PCR, antibody and lateral flow tests and compared with the trial participants who did not wear a mask.

In the end, there was no statistically significant difference between those who wore masks and those who did not when it came to being infected by Covid-19. 1.8 per cent of those wearing masks caught Covid, compared to 2.1 per cent of the control group. As a result, it seems that any effect masks have on preventing the spread of the disease in the community is small".

You're free though to argue with the experts.

Now let me just point out that I offered up evidence to support my statement .  You on the other hand have offered up nothing but your mouth.

Is there anything else I can correct you on, or educate you on today? 
Rich's sources: "The hayride.com" "The rcreader.com commentary"  The "spectator.co,uk"
Maybe, just maybe, he should try the CDC...
Posted 07/29/2021 12:00AM #4
Originally Posted by James Brown

Time and accumulated data show that masks work.  Are the divergent Fauci coments date stamped?  Opinions change with the data, that's ok.  That said, I think Fauci is being very political and evasive about our funding of Wuhan gain of function research.  There's a non-sequitur that you ought to be able to sink your teeth into.  But you tend to miss all the interesting stories.

By the way, the CDC is recommending masks again, indoors, at least in states like Florida where the Delta variant is on the rise.  It is a damn shame, but entirely predictable given that so many refuse the highly effective vaccine.  Did you get vaccinated?  I can't remember.

Jim
As for your statement about the highly effective vaccine, I'm not questioning that, however I will say that you yourself apparently "tend to miss all the interesting stories".

Did you miss the story about the "Texas Leftist Democrats who shirked their responsibility to engage in the Democratic system"?

It appears that you may have, so let me educate you further. 

There were 50+ Texas Democrats who decided to NOT engage in Democracy and perform their responsibility that taxpayers PAY them to do.

They chartered a Private Jet at taxpayer expense, flew to Wash. D.C., got hotels in Wash D.C., at taxpayer expense, and then begged for care packages from the same taxpaying Texas citizens, while receiving a monetary per diem EACH of well over $200 per day.

I guess they decided they wanted to Pocket their Per-Diem taxpayer funded expense and have someone else pay their way when they abdicated their responsibility.

Want to know the kicker??

ALL were vaccinated and yet 6 of them Got Covid 19, even after they were vaccinated.

What is your thought on that?  

Can you explain if vaccines work so perfectly?  
Posted 07/29/2021 12:05AM #5
Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

Rich's sources: "The hayride.com" "The rcreader.com commentary"  The "spectator.co,uk"
Maybe, just maybe, he should try the CDC...
Umm... no, since you don't read other than headlines.  Those stories linked studies.

Let me link it again and maybe you'll actually read (I doubt it though, since it isn't coming to you from the mouth of Don Lemon  wink)

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/do-masks-stop-the-spread-of-covid-19-

From the controlled 6000 person subject, study:  

Around half of those in the trial received 50 disposable surgical face masks, which they were told to change after eight hours of use. After one month, the trial participants were tested using both PCR, antibody and lateral flow tests and compared with the trial participants who did not wear a mask.

In the end, there was no statistically significant difference between those who wore masks and those who did not when it came to being infected by Covid-19
. 1.8 per cent of those wearing masks caught Covid, compared to 2.1 per cent of the control group. As a result, it seems that any effect masks have on preventing the spread of the disease in the community is small.


Your problem is that when you only read headlines you miss actual substance.  

Therefore I've highlighted in bold the way I would for an elementary school child.  Perhaps it will sink in then (but not likely).  
Posted 07/29/2021 12:11AM #6
Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

Rich's sources: "The hayride.com" "The rcreader.com commentary"  The "spectator.co,uk"
Maybe, just maybe, he should try the CDC...

Come on, Rod! Rich only uses the most high-quality news sources and outlets. All the rest of us are brainwashed leftists that rely on the CDC and the NIH for information regarding the pandemic. I rest my case on "What is Rich twisting and perverting today?" There is no way anyone could ever counter this amount of utter bull-hockey.
Posted 07/29/2021 12:17AM #7
Originally Posted by James Lacey


Come on, Rod! Rich only uses the most high-quality news sources and outlets. All the rest of us are brainwashed leftists that rely on the CDC and the NIH for information regarding the pandemic. I rest my case on "What is Rich twisting and perverting today?" There is no way anyone could ever counter this amount of utter bull-hockey.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/do-masks-stop-the-spread-of-covid-19-

So apparently you don't read either, you just attack the links, having no idea about the links?

Wow, now that is some REALLY amazing logic.  Attack the message and the messenger.

I suppose I can educate you now, the way I educated your 2 buddies here:

A total of 3030 participants were randomly assigned to the recommendation to wear masks, and 2994 were assigned to control; 4862 completed the study. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 42 participants recommended masks (1.8%) and 53 control participants (2.1%). The between-group difference was −0.3 percentage point (95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4 percentage point; P = 0.38) (odds ratio, 0.82 [CI, 0.54 to 1.23]; P = 0.33). Multiple imputation accounting for loss to follow-up yielded similar results. Although the difference observed was not statistically significant, the 95% CIs are compatible with a 46% reduction to a 23% increase in infection.


There, did you learn anything?  
Posted 07/29/2021 12:59AM | Edited 07/29/2021 12:59AM #8
Originally Posted by Richard Davis

As for your statement about the highly effective vaccine, I'm not questioning that, however I will say that you yourself apparently "tend to miss all the interesting stories".

Did you miss the story about the "Texas Leftist Democrats who shirked their responsibility to engage in the Democratic system"?

It appears that you may have, so let me educate you further. 

There were 50+ Texas Democrats who decided to NOT engage in Democracy and perform their responsibility that taxpayers PAY them to do.

They chartered a Private Jet at taxpayer expense, flew to Wash. D.C., got hotels in Wash D.C., at taxpayer expense, and then begged for care packages from the same taxpaying Texas citizens, while receiving a monetary per diem EACH of well over $200 per day.

I guess they decided they wanted to Pocket their Per-Diem taxpayer funded expense and have someone else pay their way when they abdicated their responsibility.

Want to know the kicker??

ALL were vaccinated and yet 6 of them Got Covid 19, even after they were vaccinated.

What is your thought on that?  

Can you explain if vaccines work so perfectly?  
Predictably, you missed the best part of the story.  The Texas Ds walked out at significant expense to "protest" minor and reasonable enhancements to the TX voting laws.  The real story is that the proposed statutes are being called Jim Crow 2.0 by D partisans up to and including Biden.  The proposed changes seem reasonable, expand voting opportunity beyond that afforded in states like NY and DE, and are nothing like a Jim Crow law.

Jim
Posted 07/29/2021 01:20AM #9
Originally Posted by James Brown

Predictably, you missed the best part of the story.  The Texas Ds walked out at significant expense to "protest" minor and reasonable enhancements to the TX voting laws.  The real story is that the proposed statutes are being called Jim Crow 2.0 by D partisans up to and including Biden.  The proposed changes seem reasonable, expand voting opportunity beyond that afforded in states like NY and DE, and are nothing like a Jim Crow law.

Jim
I missed nothing.  

In fact, I had to bring up the Story, because you ignored it, my guess being that you didn't want to upset the apple cart that your leftist buddies ride upon and you didn't want to offend them by criticizing their radical leftist leaders.

You're pretty mild in your criticism of those radical Democrats, probably because you seem to walk on eggshells in this forum w/respect to your leftist pals here.

Me?  I couldn't care less about offending them.

You?  You make excuses for them and their personal attacks. 

I always find that trait with you to be amusing.

I wonder if James Lacey, being a Texan cares to respond to the idea that all of his radical leftist Democrat legislature members left their posts to run to D.C. like the cowards they are, at taxpayer expense.

I wonder if James supports this ANTI-Democrat tactic they've engaged.

And I noticed that you conveniently dodged the fact that EVERY single one of them was vaccinated, and yet 6 of the 50 or so contracted the Corona Virus.

Would you care to comment on that fact, and give reasoning as to why you believe that they did get Corona Virus?

Is this an indication that perhaps, just perhaps the vaccine is NOT as effective as the gov't is telling us?  

Would you criticize these clowns for engaging in a SUPER SPREADER event??  

I doubt you would, however you might surprise even me!  

What is your guess?  Will James respond and give defense for his leftist legislature clowns or do you think he'll revert to his usual tactic of telling me that I live in a right wing echo chamber?  

The responses yet to come, or the lack of responses, should be interesting.  wink