Hi All,
I didn't care to dig into the 60 plus exchanges on the last thread. Maybe I missed some good ones. However, I've been re-reading the Constitution and have an open ended question for your considerable consideration and more amusement.
The question's premmiss can be based either within our Constitutional democracy or in any society considering itself to be enlightened and free. I'm giving the USA some lee way here Patriot Act, Big Brother and modern day Gestapo tactics set asside for now. Yes, that's a whine.
How should a society steeped in the traditional mainstream Christian religions handle the inflow of those of another mainstream faith, or expanding numbers of those who follow no organized faith?
In other words what would you say is a good base-line for the moral characture of a nation? Do we use the ten comandments or make a list of basic behaviors everyone can agree are crimes? I'd rather not let the word "sin" into this one, because it's society trying to protect itself I'm after.
Thanks,
Steve
8)
I didn't care to dig into the 60 plus exchanges on the last thread. Maybe I missed some good ones. However, I've been re-reading the Constitution and have an open ended question for your considerable consideration and more amusement.
The question's premmiss can be based either within our Constitutional democracy or in any society considering itself to be enlightened and free. I'm giving the USA some lee way here Patriot Act, Big Brother and modern day Gestapo tactics set asside for now. Yes, that's a whine.
How should a society steeped in the traditional mainstream Christian religions handle the inflow of those of another mainstream faith, or expanding numbers of those who follow no organized faith?
In other words what would you say is a good base-line for the moral characture of a nation? Do we use the ten comandments or make a list of basic behaviors everyone can agree are crimes? I'd rather not let the word "sin" into this one, because it's society trying to protect itself I'm after.
Thanks,
Steve
8)