Hello all,
I tentatively present my latest "finished" work: Cederblad 214 and NGC 7822. I say "finished" because I am at a point where I'm probably sufferring more from processing fatigue than fully satisfied with these images. What hurts a bit is:
1) Just when I think I have a pleasing image, I look at my histograms and see severely-clipped data. Even with these versions, I see that I am in danger of having some data clipped after performing my TIF-to-JPG conversions.
2) Some of my final processing was done on an uncalibrated laptop with a really bright screen; I'm hoping that some of the noise I'm seeing is more a result of this laptop (it's not as jarring on my calibrated monitor, the last time I checked), so I'm leaving it alone for now. If you hear a scream later on coming from my general direction it means I looked at these JPG's on my calibrated monitor and don't like what I see
This image represents 20 hours and 18 minutes of total usable exposure time taken over September and October 2007 (6 hours of H-alpha, 7 hours of SII, 7 hours of OIII, and 6 minutes each RGB for natural star colors).
Here is the nebula in the Hubble Palette:
Small: http://tinyurl.com/33s82h
Large: http://tinyurl.com/2urff4
Here it is with a pseudo-RGB look:
Small: http://tinyurl.com/2jcw6m
Large: http://tinyurl.com/354674
And here is a look that I am dubbing the SkyFactory palette, named after Davide De Martin's website (http://www.skyfactory.org/index.htm) of fabulous pseudo-RGB images taken from red and blue data from professional observatories. I don't presume that my image even comes close to his, I'm just inspired to create this image as he did his:
Small: http://tinyurl.com/364xfy
Large: http://tinyurl.com/2ooslq
To all, I wish a Merry Christmas and here's to a Fantastic New Year!
Eric
PS I've attached a small Hubble Palette version to whet your appetite.
I tentatively present my latest "finished" work: Cederblad 214 and NGC 7822. I say "finished" because I am at a point where I'm probably sufferring more from processing fatigue than fully satisfied with these images. What hurts a bit is:
1) Just when I think I have a pleasing image, I look at my histograms and see severely-clipped data. Even with these versions, I see that I am in danger of having some data clipped after performing my TIF-to-JPG conversions.
2) Some of my final processing was done on an uncalibrated laptop with a really bright screen; I'm hoping that some of the noise I'm seeing is more a result of this laptop (it's not as jarring on my calibrated monitor, the last time I checked), so I'm leaving it alone for now. If you hear a scream later on coming from my general direction it means I looked at these JPG's on my calibrated monitor and don't like what I see
This image represents 20 hours and 18 minutes of total usable exposure time taken over September and October 2007 (6 hours of H-alpha, 7 hours of SII, 7 hours of OIII, and 6 minutes each RGB for natural star colors).
Here is the nebula in the Hubble Palette:
Small: http://tinyurl.com/33s82h
Large: http://tinyurl.com/2urff4
Here it is with a pseudo-RGB look:
Small: http://tinyurl.com/2jcw6m
Large: http://tinyurl.com/354674
And here is a look that I am dubbing the SkyFactory palette, named after Davide De Martin's website (http://www.skyfactory.org/index.htm) of fabulous pseudo-RGB images taken from red and blue data from professional observatories. I don't presume that my image even comes close to his, I'm just inspired to create this image as he did his:
Small: http://tinyurl.com/364xfy
Large: http://tinyurl.com/2ooslq
To all, I wish a Merry Christmas and here's to a Fantastic New Year!
Eric
PS I've attached a small Hubble Palette version to whet your appetite.
Attached Image: