Hello: I have a chance to obtain either the TAK FSQ or the TV NP 101is. I do not need either one for visual. Which of two would provide the most options for CCD (and film and dslr) as well as simplicity in use? Any advice appreciated. Curtis
FSQ or NP 101is
Started by cbowman, 02/26/2007 02:28PM
Posted 02/26/2007 02:28PM
Opening Post
Posted 02/28/2007 02:51PM
#1
Hello Curtis,
although this is not the right forum to ask such a question, since the 2 scopes you mention are more for DSO than solar system, I would undoubtedly go with the FSQ. Even if the Televue is a good scope the Takahashi is way above it. I have the FSQ and I would not exchange it for any other lens based astrograph.
Ciao
Luca
although this is not the right forum to ask such a question, since the 2 scopes you mention are more for DSO than solar system, I would undoubtedly go with the FSQ. Even if the Televue is a good scope the Takahashi is way above it. I have the FSQ and I would not exchange it for any other lens based astrograph.
Ciao
Luca
www.amun-ra.org
Solar Imaging Website
Funding Member
