Three More "Failure To Disclose" Trips From Mr Ethics, Clarence ThomasPosted By Rod Kaufman |
Hmm, where to begin...Originally Posted by James Brown
Did you notice the 9-0 mifepristone decision today? Harlan Crow must have bought them all?
First, the merits of the case weren't considered in the ruling.
"By throwing out the case on such grounds, the court avoided reaching a decision on the legal merits of whether the FDA acted lawfully in lifting various restrictions, including one making the drug obtainable via mail, meaning the same issues could yet return to the court in another case."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rejects-bid-restrict-access-abortion-pill-rcna151308
Second, the cons know they're in a highly charged political season with the upcoming election at hand. This is just a play on their part and the lack of standing provides a delaying option until the case is reheard again when it will be decided on its merits at which time the cons will ban the pill...