MN56 or M6511 or 4 1/2" refractor?Posted By John Biretta |
I once did some side-by-side comparisons of a 4" APO and a 6" F/12
Mak-Cass on planets. The views were pretty similar, except the
Mak-Cass took a very long time to cool-down and equal the APO.
So given your interests and choices, my vote would be for something
like the 120 ED.
Between a 120 ED refractor and MN56, my vote would again be for
the refractor. The MN56 central obstruction will decrease planetary
resolution slightly, and mirrors (typical coatings) will give
slightly dimmer images. And again there are some cool-down
issues with the MN. If you were looking at a 6" or 7" MN
then I might reconsider.
Mak-Cass on planets. The views were pretty similar, except the
Mak-Cass took a very long time to cool-down and equal the APO.
So given your interests and choices, my vote would be for something
like the 120 ED.
Between a 120 ED refractor and MN56, my vote would again be for
the refractor. The MN56 central obstruction will decrease planetary
resolution slightly, and mirrors (typical coatings) will give
slightly dimmer images. And again there are some cool-down
issues with the MN. If you were looking at a 6" or 7" MN
then I might reconsider.