Image of the day

Captured by
Douglas Rollain

Lion Nebula SH2-132 - RC71

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Jim Thommes

July 25, 2010 11:55 PM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

New Processing on the Cocoon.

Posted By Jim Thommes

Floyd,
Looks real nice. Hold up real well at the higher resolutions.

July 28, 2010 03:52 AM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

M101 reprocessed

Posted By Jim Thommes

Charlie,
Nice M101. I like what you and Floyd are doing. It may be interesting to see even a few more evolutions of the image.


July 28, 2010 03:58 AM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

The Lobster (Still Shooting Low)

Posted By Jim Thommes

Thanks for the comments folks.

Charlie,
On a scale of 128, Red -114, Grn -128, Blu -141. But I have to say, I did push up the blue a bit further on the nebula (using a star mask).

August 1, 2010 12:00 AM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

Abel 71

Posted By Jim Thommes

Wow, Nicely done Rolando.

August 1, 2010 12:08 AM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

Sharpless 2-188

Posted By Jim Thommes

Very Nice Dan. I will never again feel bad about processing data 4 months after
taking it.

August 3, 2010 03:46 AM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

M27 in RGB:Ha:OIII

Posted By Jim Thommes

Hi Tyler,
Nice extended nebulosity. Looks like the extended portions are OIII?. What data set did it show up in? Blue or OIII? Also, how did you combine the 5 data sets? Did you use one as a Luminance layer, or did you just mix the Ha / OIII into the RGB data? It look like you spent three times the time on the Ha and OIII as you did on the RGB's, so I'm guessing you had fair detail in the Ha and OIII.

August 3, 2010 04:00 AM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

The Elliptical Globular - M19

Posted By Jim Thommes

Tyler, David,
Thanks for the comments.

David,
I still have and use my Artemis285. The Art is interline and the 8300 is full frame. The 8300 wells are smaller though. So I kind of expected an increase in signal level based on full frame, but a decrease due to smaller well size / capacity. I think that a sensitivity comparison is about a push. The 8300 has a higher number of warm pixels than the Art with the Sony chip - I expected that.

So far, I have been using 1-1/4 inch filters on the 8300 - its not bad. The vignetting is not too bad (but I have mounted the filter wheel as close as possible). A flat set or even a pseudo flat works well - most of my images on the 8300 have not been cropped beyond a few percent needed to eliminate where RGBs are not aligned on the edges.

I also do some work with a DSLR. I found the 8300 to be a little like the DSLR except for the Mono data aspect (and, of course, a significant increase in sensitivity and S/N). The back focus is shorter than the DSLR (even with filter wheel) but longer than the Art.

Overall, I am pretty happy with the 8300. It is the first camera I reach for. I will use the Art or DSLR on a second setup while the 8300 is pumping out data on my primary setup.

August 12, 2010 04:17 AM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

M20 and M21

Posted By Jim Thommes

Thanks for the comments folks.

August 14, 2010 05:25 PM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

M20 and M21

Posted By Jim Thommes

Thanks for the comments guys.

August 23, 2010 12:18 AM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

Sh2-155 Cave Nebula

Posted By Jim Thommes

Cool image Maciej. I am wondering if you might have red clipped a bit on the brightest part of the nebula.