Acceptable Levels of ViolencePosted By Rod Kaufman |
Thus far, the only "surge" in Iraq is the inSURGEncy.
Enter George W Bush who now states there will always be a an "acceptable level of violence" no matter where you happen to be. Such levels of violence occur in varying degrees all over the world. While it happens to be relatively low in the United States, with an occasional hiccup now and then, it happens to be relatively high in Iraq. So, as the logic from Bush goes, don't expect the violence to subside from the particular society we happen to be involved with in Iraq today. There will always be violence in Iraq but it can be an acceptable level of violence.
Get used to it, it's normal for that particular region. So what if the Red Cross states the conditions for the Iraqi people are "unbearable". They just don't understand what acceptable levels of violence happen to be and that will be defined by George W Bush, at a time to be determined later...
Enter George W Bush who now states there will always be a an "acceptable level of violence" no matter where you happen to be. Such levels of violence occur in varying degrees all over the world. While it happens to be relatively low in the United States, with an occasional hiccup now and then, it happens to be relatively high in Iraq. So, as the logic from Bush goes, don't expect the violence to subside from the particular society we happen to be involved with in Iraq today. There will always be violence in Iraq but it can be an acceptable level of violence.
Get used to it, it's normal for that particular region. So what if the Red Cross states the conditions for the Iraqi people are "unbearable". They just don't understand what acceptable levels of violence happen to be and that will be defined by George W Bush, at a time to be determined later...