Let's talk the Science.Posted By Darian Rachal |
PM sent.Originally Posted by James Brown
Hi Darian:
Hopefully a misunderstanding, but the language you used in your post made it sound like you have no problem with an adult having sex with a 10 (or 11) year old girl, so long as she "consents." Apologies if I was misunderstanding your post. Jim
Let's talk the Science.Posted By Darian Rachal |
James, why are you incapable of recognizing that the matter may have been consensual? The child had reached puberty at an early(10 or 11) age. The fact that it may have been consensual in no way justifies what occurred. You and others seem to have a problem with my use of the word consensual.Originally Posted by James Lacey
So, Mel, I have a suggestion. In light of Rich's nonsense that Democrats are willingly killing black babies and Darian's abysmal choice of words and reasoning regarding pedophilia, might I suggest that if you have something to say, then be straightforward about it? I've tried to understand what you are saying a few times, and I still have no idea. If you are not careful, Dave may question your sobriety next!
Let's talk the Science.Posted By Darian Rachal |
Brian, you are speaking in a strictly legal context. I'm not stupid!Originally Posted by Brian McFarland
No shit. Jim explained why, too (it's not possible for a child to consent). You don't understand that? Yikes
Let's talk the Science.Posted By Darian Rachal |
I don't recall saying that the child did. I'm simply saying that she may have consented to the activity. That's what you do not understand. You seem to be unable to grasp the fact that a 10-11 year old child who has reached puberty very early is capable of consenting to an activity without recognizing the implications.Originally Posted by Brian McFarlandThere's no way a 10-year old has the maturity to understand the meaning of the word, let alone the consequences. This is an unbelievably simple thing that you don't seem to understand.
Let's talk the Science.Posted By Darian Rachal |
You obviously are incapable of understanding my point. Make an effort to view the situation less emotionally. Perhaps you have too much estrogen coursing through your body.Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck
I guess they do things differently down in Louisiana. I was going to comment when you first posted, now you're saying that the child "may have" consented? That's just sick. You're not doing yourself any favors by doubling down.
Let's talk the Science.Posted By Darian Rachal |
Let's talk the Science.Posted By Darian Rachal |
Jim, I find your "digging a deeper hole" idea amusing. If I'd stated that I find it plausible that the girl "agreed" rather than consented to have sex with the illegal alien, would that make it easier for you to understand?Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck
Yes, he keeps digging a deeper hole, doesn't he. Then he says I don't get his point and I'm emotional? Yeah, they are a different breed down there in LA.
Let's talk the Science.Posted By Darian Rachal |
James, if you and the others are incapable of distinguishing the difference between consensual in this situation and an adult, I'll accept your inability. It's difficult for me to fathom what you think I insinuated.Originally Posted by James Lacey
Darian said, and I quote, "I suspect that the sex between this 10-year-old girl and the man in the US illegally was consensual. If you give the matter some thought, that seems reasonable." Any reasonable person would read this and conclude that Darian said a 10-year-old could consent. For a relationship to be consensual, both parties must agree. That is, after all, what consensus means. I find it odd that everyone else in the forum had a problem with Darian's statement, but you, who has to jump in and make an utterly contrived argument that Darian didn't say that a 10-year-old can consent when the plain reading of his statement implies precisely that. I suppose you could argue he chose his words poorly or that maybe he misspoke, but that would fly in the face of him later doubling down on his original statement. Indeed, it's utter nonsense for you to claim that Darian never said that a 10-year-old could consent. We can all see his words in plain English and black-and-white. That's some major gas-lighting on your part.
Let's talk the Science.Posted By Darian Rachal |
James, would it make you feel better if I'd said the girl agreed to have sex with the illegal alien?Originally Posted by James Lacey
Darian,
The smart thing to do would be to admit you chose your words poorly and to forthrightly state that it is impossible for a 10-year-old to consent. Otherwise, you said what you said, and no amount of back-pedaling or gas lighting by Rich will change that.
Let's talk the Science.Posted By Darian Rachal |
James, that is likely what occurred between the pubescent girl and the illegal alien, based on the circumstances that Rich elaborated on in an earlier post about the child's mother. Why you are having difficulty wrapping your head around this is beyond me, unless you think I am somehow approving of what occurred.Originally Posted by James Lacey
No! Darian, I don't know why this is so hard for you to understand. A 10-year-old cannot agree to sex with an adult. I have to say, I find it hard to believe we even have to have this conversation.
