Tak Teegul or DiscMount DC6 for TEC140Posted By Eddie Ho |
Dear Evan
I read a posting in TEC/Yahoo group about putting the Tec-140 on Tak Teegul Mount which has slo-mo function. I got my TEC-140 #117. It is such a gem! I love to play around with the focusor and the rotator. Fun fun fun! So it is understandable that I want to get the best Alt-azu mount to mate with it. The choice I narrow down to is DiscMount DC-6, that is until I read the TEC/Yahho posting about the TEC-140/Teegul combo. That put me into 2nd thought about the DiscMount. I read with surprise that the Tak Teegull can ssupport the wt. of Tec140. Then the next Tec/Yahoo posting confuse me further. Another reader use the Dsicmount upto 300X and just finger knudge the scope for tracking! I always thought that the Teegul can only support the capcity of Sky90. Presently I have a Universal Astronomics Surveyor wood tripod plus the dual axle Giro mount. Very stable but not smooth enough. Which way should I go: Discmount or the Tak Teegul? Can you fellows help me out?
I read a posting in TEC/Yahoo group about putting the Tec-140 on Tak Teegul Mount which has slo-mo function. I got my TEC-140 #117. It is such a gem! I love to play around with the focusor and the rotator. Fun fun fun! So it is understandable that I want to get the best Alt-azu mount to mate with it. The choice I narrow down to is DiscMount DC-6, that is until I read the TEC/Yahho posting about the TEC-140/Teegul combo. That put me into 2nd thought about the DiscMount. I read with surprise that the Tak Teegull can ssupport the wt. of Tec140. Then the next Tec/Yahoo posting confuse me further. Another reader use the Dsicmount upto 300X and just finger knudge the scope for tracking! I always thought that the Teegul can only support the capcity of Sky90. Presently I have a Universal Astronomics Surveyor wood tripod plus the dual axle Giro mount. Very stable but not smooth enough. Which way should I go: Discmount or the Tak Teegul? Can you fellows help me out?