Current build quality of the LXD55Posted By Ricardo Amador |
I have read many of the last couple of months posts and would
appreciate comments on the following questions.
Has there been any substantial design improvements by Meade to the
LXD55 since its release?
Does Meade seem to recognize the problems you all have been dealing
with and do they care?
I really do not mind tinkering, polishing and "fixing" bad
design/quality control if what I end up with is something that works
like it should have out of the box... I consider myself mechanically
competent and might even enjoy taking the mount apart and making it
work if... IF... I will end up with something that actually works
and is a good value for what I paid. Is that really what the LXD55
mount is or is it a hopelessly bad design?
Thanks for all the comments and typing effort in advance.
dwight
appreciate comments on the following questions.
Has there been any substantial design improvements by Meade to the
LXD55 since its release?
Does Meade seem to recognize the problems you all have been dealing
with and do they care?
I really do not mind tinkering, polishing and "fixing" bad
design/quality control if what I end up with is something that works
like it should have out of the box... I consider myself mechanically
competent and might even enjoy taking the mount apart and making it
work if... IF... I will end up with something that actually works
and is a good value for what I paid. Is that really what the LXD55
mount is or is it a hopelessly bad design?
Thanks for all the comments and typing effort in advance.
dwight