Re: INTOLERANCE AMONG RELIGIONS:Posted By Jason Fry |
Harold Pollner said:
Rivalry and intolerance among religions are probably the leading reasons for wars throughout recorded history.
The world's most populous Religions are also the ones who claim exclusivity when it comes to stating which is the more "valid" religion.
Although my religion is the well-established Lutheran Protestant, I personally do not think that my religion, (or even the whole of Protestantism) is any more the "valid" religion than any other.
The important thing is that the individual have a faith in SOME belief, regardless of what it is called!
Protestants have the "true,valid" religion. So do Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Confucionists, and any other religion you can name. There is no "right" religion and no "wrong" religion.
They are ALL the "valid" religion because they have their believers, and who can deny a belief?
Harold Pollner
Harold,
Although I'm in sympathy (and agree with) the attitude of being tolerant and respectful of others' beliefs, I disagree strongly with your assertion that any belief is "valid" (if, by that, you mean that it doesn't matter whether it's true or not). To say that beliefs that are antithetical to each other are equally valid is nonsense. In fact, I would assert that to say that that a person's belief that is diametrically opposite of mine is equally valid is not to respect him/her or at all; it is to trivialize what that person believes. Now it's not "valid" for me (or anyone) to treat another with whom I diagree with disrespect, or to suggest that I am somehow better than he or she is because what I believe contradicts what he/she believes or vice-versa. But to suggest that it doesn't matter what one believes is to scorn your own convictions and to trivialize the other person's.
Regards,
Jason Fry