Image of the day

Captured by
Douglas Rollain

M20 Trifid Nebula in LRGBHa

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Steve Hoff

October 11, 2006 02:25 AM Forum: Polls

The biggest threat to world peace

Posted By Steve Hoff

So, plain and simple, we stop supporting Israel and everyone goes back to their corners and is content? The despotic governments that routinely starve their people lock them up torture them by the thousands, would all turn over power of their governments over to the will of the people. So that consensual governments could be formed, sounds like a good deal to me. Sadly, not likely. Would you stop supporting your friend(s) if the group pressured you to do so?

You are correct in that the U.S. does use its veto power when needed to support its goals, (or, to thwart those of other governments. But, you also have to admit that other countries on the security council also Routinely play their veto to thwart the U.S.’s agenda (a little tit-for-tat, eh?), you might also agree that there is a LOT of back scratching going on behind closed doors, and probably hypocritical open air pandering to the “base” by the respective diplomats to their country of origin. I agree with you whole-heartedly that the UN is a relic that never lived up to it’s potential, and should now be discarded. I have little interest in Syria telling that my countries human rights record is abhorrent.

I have no way of determining if Ahmadinejad is smarter, or dumber than Bush, and I don’t think you do either. All either of us can do is recite what we here in the media. True, Bush is inarticulate as hell, but is that really a determiner of raw intelligence? If you read the “experts” when they analyze the college grades and writings, Bush comes out with a higher IQ than Al Gore (I do seem to remember that both had comparable college transcripts, with Bush’s being slightly higher). I have watched Ahmadinejad on TV (60 minutes and some other show, and, he is smooth, he answers questions with questions, he tells the interviewer that he is smart, and his interviewer doesn’t (didn’t) press him when he didn’t answer. Does that make him smarter? I don’t think so.

China and Russia, gee, I don’t know what to think of them. Both of them have human rights records that put the rest of the world to shame (including the Zionist Israel…how many Israeli citizens have been murdered by their own government, I cant remember). Russia is loosing 700k people per year compared to their birth rate (they desperately need hard currency and labor, or they will cease to exist as they are). Putin just had one of his out spoken critics in the press murdered. China, still keeps their stock market “hidden” there is no way to determine if their companies are making money, or are being propped up by the government (i.e. how solvent is their economy, if it falters, it will bring many of us down.). They are killing and displacing thousands as they prepare to put on a show for the Olympics. Yes, they are gobbling up resources hand over fist, but do to their population control measures, in 20-25 years, they will be out of young workers, who will support the economy so that the old people can get their government subsidies? It will be interesting to watch how these two deal with the cards they have been dealt (as well as the ones they have played). What would you do if you were them, would you sidle up to the neighborhood crackpot?
Ahmadinejad, I don’t see him as a direct threat (same as you, yes?). I do see him as a troublemaker whose goals are to stir the pot and see what trouble boils over (he wants prestige, like many people). Yes, I think he will try to play the U.S. do I think he will be successful? I don’t know, again, to make that conclusion requires more info than I have (or a damn good crystal ball). As far as nuclear weapons, when was the last time Israel threatened a neighbor with nuclear weapons? When did Israel admit that it has nuclear weapons? When did Israel tell the world that it (the world) would be better off without ________(fill in the blank)? If you remember some of the incursions into the Palestinian territories by Israel, they often did things that militarily were foolish so as to minimize collateral damage. Do you think some of Israel’s neighbors would extend the same courtesy if they were to engage Israel in an open conflict? How many Israeli soldiers killed themselves with suicide bomb as they stepped onto busses with Palestinian children? I can’t think of any. You are from the Ontario area, so you get U.S. news? As well as your own, do you follow the papers in Europe? How do you know that only the U.S. is concerned with Iran’s nuclear capability? Besides, considering the history the U.S. has with Iran, it isn’t strange at all to me that we might be more concerned about Iran’s nuclear ambitions than some other countries. It is funny though that in your statement, there are comments that the U.S. should be considerate about everyone else’s “feelings”, yet, you don’t seem to hold the same reciprocal opinions for the “feelings” of the U.S., or did I misinterpret?

October 11, 2006 11:36 AM Forum: Polls

The biggest threat to world peace

Posted By Steve Hoff

The UN is a brilliant idea when the majority of the countries demonstrate similar core values (or interpretations of goals). For instance, a country that is governed by Sharia Law will interpret human rights (or the rights of women) differently than a western secular government. If one or two Islamic countries find themselves on the Security Council, how will they vote? They likely will vote their conscience, which likely will not be consistent with the values of a western secular government. I agree with your comment that there is a need to be protected from the tyranny of the majority (we might differ on who the majority is though 8^).
If you were a member of the UN military, and the SC agreed and voted to do something (or do nothing, i.e. Kosovo, or Sudan, or..) that you found morally wrong, or just flat disagreed with, what exactly would your obligations be? How would the U.N. dues be determined? By population, by GDP? The U.S. (if I am correct) pays ~25% or so of the UN budget. Is that fair (or does fair matter)?

October 12, 2006 02:16 AM Forum: Polls

The biggest threat to world peace

Posted By Steve Hoff

Glad I wasnt alone ...

June 26, 2008 10:51 PM Forum: Polls

Drill ANWR

Posted By Steve Hoff

I am curious, are you a geologist or a reservoir completion engineer? how do you know how much oil is in place, and how much is recoverable? Or, more specifically, did you consider primary or secondary recoverable.
FWIW, I am a geochemist, and while I do not have a problem walking to work when I can I do prefer the driving when it is 100*F outside and the drilling rig is 20 miles off the highway and the turn off is 50 or more mile from the nearest town.

August 5, 2008 04:44 PM Forum: Polls

THE QUESTION - some of you shouldn't look - you have been warned

Posted By Steve Hoff

I agree with a-lot of what Jeff has said here, in addition I would like to add that another reason the costs are sooo high is that at the end of the day, the patient or "consumer" is take out of the loop. What I mean by that is that the doctors/hospitals "negotiate" with your insurance company to decide what work to have done, and how much it "ought" to cost. And, then the "consumer" then is screwed because he gets stuck with higher premiums, or, the "taxpayer" is screwed because of higher costs.
this is in no way and endorsement of ANY crap foreign health care program. I am not interested in the mortality rates etc of Cuba or of any other country.

August 9, 2008 03:54 AM Forum: Polls

THE QUESTION - some of you shouldn't look - you have been warned

Posted By Steve Hoff

you are correct, the chart is correct, no question. But is it really relevant? for it really tells only about the past.

Now, if I can offer my dimwitted query, considering these figures are of known reserves, they by no means reflect what is to be discovered (yes, I am an optimist). How will we know if we do not explore?

August 18, 2008 02:08 AM Forum: Polls

THE QUESTION - some of you shouldn't look - you have been warned

Posted By Steve Hoff

while the pollsters love that stupid and in my opinion, asinine question. Answers to it are seldom informative and useful, because it requires a yes or no answer. Libs, likely will answer it is "No" (they hate Bush and everything he says and does), ergo, an answer of "No". Conservatives may also answer the country is on the wrong track (for completely different reasons), thereby yielding a high percentage of "wrong track answers".
FWIW
I fall in the later group. I believe in a strong economy, and a strong national defense, I believe in personal responsibility, and a market economy, if illegals want to come into this country, they can, at their own risk (of deportation and imprisonment), I think it is absurd and asinine that ballots and other public government documents are written in any other language than English (I am more or less fluent in both German and Russian). I also, agree with the Carter Doctrine (which apparently so does President George W. Bush).
And finally, I do not think Obama is a classic Marxist, I do however believe he believes in some kind of "hybrid marxism". Which leaves me wondering which of the four likely candidates will do the least harm to my civil liberties.

August 23, 2008 03:56 AM Forum: Polls

THE QUESTION - some of you shouldn't look - you have been warned

Posted By Steve Hoff

Richard,

While I am amazed and pleased that you and I actually agree grin on something, I must add that I do disagree with your premise of your first paragraph (commenting on "the bigger question". How do you know what parameters people are using to answer this question? I just gave examples (albeit biased and partisan in regards to my thoughts on the libs....but, they do hate Bush), as well as an example as to why conservatives in this case(me) might be dissatisfied with the current administration. but, I also articulated at least one point as to why I supported the current admin.

I disagree that Obama is a blank slate. He presents himself as one, so that non discerning or even just plain (ie, well intentioned) citizens can fill in with what they "hope for", after all, who is against "fairness" or "free health care"? But, there is ample information available on the man, and he has said what he wants to do (whether the media covers it is another matter).

just this week, he played the moral equivalence card by comparing the invasion of the Republic of Georgia by Russia with the U.S. overthrow of the brutal Saddam Hussein government in Iraq. Obama has much to answer in regards to his philosophy and his ties to the teachings of Saul Alinsky (Hillary is also a student of Saul), Bill Ayers, who not only is a non repentant terrorist, but also involved in the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (which the records have now become sealed, and yes, they did use public monies). as well as his (Bill Ayers) involvement with revamping education (so that it reflects "social justice") (City Journal had a nice article a year or so ago).

and finally, as I ramble on, I don't know when Obama has been to china, but, I was there in the mid 1990s (yeah, I know that was 10 years ago), but just because they made a bunch of nice "shiny" things for the Olympics doesn't mean their infrastructure or their society is any good. I am not surprised that the mainstream media didn't cover his comments, because if they did, it is possible that organized labor might (the ought to) rethink their allegiance to Obama.

Anyway, too much fun for tonight....

August 26, 2008 11:53 PM Forum: Polls

Biden

Posted By Steve Hoff

I might also add that Obama in particular has not been in the habit of bipartisanship and working across the aisle. Obamas mantra of "come together" is, "here is my idea, why don't you be OPEN minded and adopt what I want to do.

August 29, 2008 02:01 PM Forum: Polls

Biden

Posted By Steve Hoff

Herb,

you are very perceptive!

http://www.cnbc.com/id/26454655