Jim Babcock said:
It looks like Obama is planning a surge in Afghanistan:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=afll.9YZiyUY&refer=worldwide
Where is the outrage, protests and statements from the left about how it will not work? I guess the left really does not care about the use of force and the potential for the deaths of young men and women in uniform, it is just politics. When a Republican President commits more troops to improve the success of the US military, it is one thing, and it is radically different when an the inexperienced first black President from the Democrat party does it.
Will the left press for a draft in order for Obama to make sure that there are enough troops? What is the exit strategy? Are these only appropriate questions when a Republican is President?
I am not against the surge, we on the right have ALWAYS supported the troops. Their use is not partisan, but the left's hypocrisy is legendary.
The "deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan" as stated in the article, is a direct result of the misguided policies of the Bush administration that Obama has to deal with along with the global financial crisis, also a by-product of the Bush years of deregulation and cowboy diplomacy.
The last we all looked the terrorists in Afghanistan were actually the ones that attacked us on 9/11 so perhaps that's why you haven't seen an outcry from anyone for attacking the rong country.
Of course there's no need for a draft so why press for one?
An exit strategy for thirty thousand troops? No way! We're just going to leave 'em there forever, Jim. They'll be rotated out like the others just as NATO has done...