TTFNPosted By James Brown |
I gotta hand it to you Rich, you have kept your promise and avoided replying to me for a couple of days. Still, during this time, you have referred to me in the third person at least half a dozen times. Maybe more. It is obvious that I still live in your head even though you have avoided responding to me directly. I guess I should consider myself lucky.Originally Posted by Richard Davis
You may have noticed that the Resident leftist apologist who claims to be the staunch DEFENDER of the Constitution, has never had the Balls to even once speak out about the Gross Violation of the First Amendment that is occurring in this nation, which Twitter, Facebook, and the Leftist Press is currently engaging in, whereby if the left and the Press decide they don't want you to know information, they shut your postings down, and kick you off facebook, twitter, and Google.
They ARE engaging surreptitiously in Election Tampering by making sure that NO negative stories about Joe Biden or anyone in his family are propagated across social media, a media whereby MANY people get their information.
That's called suppression of free speech, but yet do you see the resident leftist apologist, TDS suffering, Staunch Promoter of the US Constitution speak out here about what is going on with the Press and their tyranny to shut down entire Newspapers on Google, Twitter, and Facebook?
My guess is that you'll never hear his outrage, because I don't believe he even has any outrage over the blatant, One-sided reporting in which the corrupt leftist press is engaging.
Any REAL believer and supporter of the US Constitution would be appalled as you and I are, but he's apparently not.
His silence on this matter speaks VOLUMES!!
This all started when I pointed out that you had made what I viewed to be a racist argument. Like I said then, I could be wrong and the line of argument I thought was racist in context might have been entirely benign. Rather than going ape-shit as you did last week, why don't you explain to us why your Puerto Rico poverty/crime/corrupt governance line of argument (including the gratuitous Liberia crack) was not a racist argument in the context of our Constitutional law discussion?
Jim