SCOTUS Poised To Give Trump Even More Unbridled PowerPosted By Russ Carroll |
Originally Posted by James Brown
I look at all the politically hot cases - none qualify as shilling for Trump. In other words, none of the cases I have read seem to stray from proper conservative jurisprudence. I don't blame Kagan, Ketanji-Brown and Sotomayor for dissenting either. They are not shilling for the Democrats. They are applying proper liberal jurisprudence to the issues before them. I do not understand why smart guys like you and Rod insist on seeing these decisions as obviously "wrong" or obviously "biased" for political reasons. You might disagree with the outcome, but the outcomes are not "wrong" or examples of the Court shilling for anyone. The outcomes are the natural results of conservative justices applying conservative legal principals to difficult legal issues.
Man, I am not comfortable with this. Correct me if I am wrong, but the core job of the Supreme Court is to test whether something is constitutional or not, no? You implies that constitutionality cant really be determined because it depends on the viewpoint of the Justice. That implies the Constitution cant really be followed as a standard. Shouldnt it be that regardless of your political persuasion, a Justice that is legally qualified should come to the same conclusion consistently on any given issue?