Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

Jim Babcock said:

Wrong. The right believes that there is plenty that actually could have been done. However "the ONE" had to pay back his cronies for getting his regime into power and to do the maximum damage possible to the country. It was he who said never let a disaster go by without taking full advantage. He never has been focused on actually fixing the economy he is more interested in taking over industries, schmoozing with buddies like Chavez and increasing the debt as much as possible. Republicans are completely irrelevant since Obama and other socialists are in complete control. So even if there are a few on the right who would rather do nothing, it makes no difference. What is important for citizens to do is for them to oppose policies of a President who when they believe those policies are destructive to the country. Obama provides more reasons to oppose his policies on a daily basis. So good conservatives should oppose him on that basis. That is not doing nothing or being negative. It is being realistic about a situation when an extreme socialist liberal and his friends have complete control and any idea they present is opposed by those in power.

Jim Babcock said:

None of the above. Being the diverse party that believes in freedom of speech and democracy, we believe that at this time it is not important for us to appoint any one person to speak for us. The Dems are in complete control of the government and likely will remain so for 3.5 years. We are happy having Obama being the focal point for political discord. Appointing a single voice for the right would deflect the well deserved attention that the dictator gets daily. I know that it is frustrating for the libs to not have a person to make the devil as a focal point. The left has attempted to choose a leader for us, but it will not work. The idiot in the White House will remain the focus. Nice try though.

Jim Babcock said:

I got the impression from reading threads here on AM, and messages on both moveon.org and democraticunderground.com. I believe in seeing all perspectives. Liberal commentators and elected libs are constrained. Going to sites like the ones I listed provides a less filtered perspective of exactly what the left's base really think.

Jim Babcock said:

Lefties were so sure that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would lose control of Iran. They stated directly that Obama just giving ONE speech to the terrorists was enough for the world to change and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would suddenly not be in control of Iran. While everyone would like to see a friendlier government in Iran, those who have a brain understand that the idiot in the White House had nothing to do with the decisions of those in Iran.

Iran is if anything more under the control of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Will the Obama lemmings admit the truth Obama's lack of genius and diplomacy, or will they continue their delusion?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/15/world/middleeast/15assess.html?_r=1&ref=world