GOP lawmakers told Trump takes some responsibility for Capitol riotPosted By Greg Shaffer |
Gonna keep spouting that debunked crap I guess? LOL
GOP lawmakers told Trump takes some responsibility for Capitol riotPosted By Greg Shaffer |
GOP lawmakers told Trump takes some responsibility for Capitol riotPosted By Greg Shaffer |
Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
The capitol was assaulted by a fired-up mob of Trumptoids. That's reality; that's what happened. Trump and the GOP who supported his insane lies and rants are now having to answer for what they did in the form of sanctions from private companies who will withhold or demand to have their political contributions returned, at least one GOP rep who took part in the riot resigned after being arrested for it, another lost a committee assignment at Harvard, others like Halley and Cruz are facing censorship and your president will be impeached, again.
Have a nice day...
GOP lawmakers told Trump takes some responsibility for Capitol riotPosted By Greg Shaffer |
Psychics and then sycophantsPosted By Greg Shaffer |
Psychics and then sycophantsPosted By Greg Shaffer |
Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck
OK, Greg, just one example. Are you claiming the legislature in Michigan, which is run by the republicans, and who made up all of the rules for this election, including mail in balloting in years past, was wrong to certify the election that Biden won by over 100,000 votes?
Trump won Michigan by less than 10,000 last time. I guess we all should have taken up our guns and Clinton flags, stormed the state capital, and demanded that she be declared the winner.
Psychics and then sycophantsPosted By Greg Shaffer |
Originally Posted by James Lacey
What about all the Republicans that were elected on the same ballot that Trump lost on using the same voting technologies, policies, and procedures. To be consistent, shouldn't Greg also be concerned that those elections were stolen from Democrats? The bottom line is that if there were any evidence of voter fraud or irregularities that would have stolen Trump's election, it would have been presented by now. It's not that the courts refused to hear the evidence or even consider the evidence; it's that none was ever even presented!
Psychics and then sycophantsPosted By Greg Shaffer |
Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
Greg is simply echoing what he hears or reads on wingnut sources like OAN. It doesn't even phase him or his sources that these same lies about election fraud have been continually refuted in the courts. The usual response from him or his sources will be along the lines of, "it's a matter of record that so and so was changed in state election codes and therefore..." First, if these were so important, they would have been brought up in court, and in some cases they may have been, but the courts have found them to be without merit. Second, many of these challenges occurred before a ballot count, and the courts found the states to be compliant in their laws. There's NO basis for what Greg and his cohorts at OAN and elsewhere are peddling...
Now Liz Cheney is on board for impeachment.Posted By Greg Shaffer |
Psychics and then sycophantsPosted By Greg Shaffer |
Originally Posted by James Lacey
The problem is Greg, if anyone had ignored election laws, then Trump and his Kraken's have had plenty of time to produce the evidence. Where is the evidence? You don't get to claim there was a violation, and then when the court throws your lawsuit out for lack of merit, complain they wouldn't listen to you.
Psychics and then sycophantsPosted By Greg Shaffer |