Posts Made By: Jim Moscheck

Originally Posted by James Lacey

What? The informant that Comer built his entire charade on has gone missing? Yet another victim of the Clinton body count, I'm sure! 

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

Hi Jim B,
Thanks for the info on the Nagler patents. It's interesting and informative.
PS: You're right about the quote button being off; I can quote others in my replies but not my own. 

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

So then, your complete ignoring of my question, where I asked "what do you think of the Durham report?", is the non-answer you're going to offer up?  

I wonder why it is, that whenever any leftist like you is asked a Direct question, the only answer they ever give is "whatabout...." and then jump on their high horse and claim that the right is always claiming "whatabout" as you did when you deflected and made it about Trump, due to your TDS?  

So then since I'll point out that you're deflecting to Jared Kushner, Donald Trump, and don't care to answer, I'll challenge you again to answer about the Durham report after I DO give an answer to your deflection question about Kushner.

So you asked What do you think of Jared Kushner getting 2B from the Saudis?, where you claim it is the same as the Hunter Biden deal from China.

First of all, Kushner's firm did not have the blessing of getting $2 Billion right off the bat.  

His firm Affinity Partners, was going to be given $500 Million with the stipulation required by the Saudis that he would put an investment management team together consisting of some prominent investment managers.  

His firm did exactly that.  They hired the private equity firms of Bret Perlman and Asad Naqvi.  Kushner and his partners firm were then awarded the contract partly because his firm gave them (the Saudis) a discount from the usual 2% rate down to 1.25%.

Kushner's firm also agreed to provide a discount of the carried interest portion of Kushner's firms rate of 20% and give that to the Saudis as well.

Subsequent to that, it is reported that the Saudis had a stipulation in the deal that they would receive in exchange for their $2 Billion investment, a 28% stake in the main investment fund that Kushner put together.

Crown Prince Salman stepped in and met with the oversight group, and decided to invest in Kushner's investment firm probably partly because Jared Kushner was so instrumental in putting together the Abraham Accords.  Perhaps he had faith in Kushner's ability to understand how gov'ts operate and decided to go with them because he had already proven himself in getting the Abraham Accords agreement between the Saudis and the Israelis.  

Furthermore, he had a good understanding of gov't policies and the overall Geopolitical systems according to the Saudi investment fund panel members.

Now then, as reported by the NY Times, liberal's favorite paper of record, the Saudis put this caveat in place:  The Saudis had stipulated that Mr. Kushner’s firm could draw down only $500 million of the $2 billion commitment before “having a qualified investment team in place, on-boarding core operational professionals and constructing the investment committee.”

So since the Kushner investment firm hired several professional investment firms to join his company, there are now 20 people in the firm, which was reported to the Securities and Exchange commission, as filed by Affinty partners.

Also, of the 20 half are experienced investor professionals.  

Is that enough information for you or would you like me to elaborate further?

Now then, Hunter Biden's investment firm secured $2 Billion from the Communist Chinese Gov't.

Provide me a synopsis of what Hunter Biden's firm did for the Communist Chinese Gov't to secure their $2 Billion payment to Hunter's firm.  

Please be as specific as I just was regarding Jared Kushner's investment firm.  Who are the partners and members of Hunter Biden's firm and how many investment experts with vast experience that they have on staff?4

After you answer that question (if you don't again deflect), then maybe you can address my original question to you when I asked about the Durham report and how it showed that the FBI was/is as corrupt as the day is long.

Or you can do your usual deflection.  

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

2 that I know of.  What does that have to do with anything?  Durham stated that he wouldn't be pressing for prosecutions.

What would be the point, to continue to do like the Democrat operatives do with Repubs. and just have prosecution after prosecution of Ds, which do nothing but waste taxpayer money.

The Democrats would interfere anyway and stonewall.  They have been all along and covering up for Biden and his criminality. 

How many pages of the Durham report did you read?  My guess is zero.  

How would you possibly know what's contained in it?  

Anderson Cooper didn't even mention it on his show yesterday.  

Neither did the gal who followed him, not one mention of the Durham probe.

That's called cover up by omission.