Image of the day

Captured by
Gerald Elkin

House Finch

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Rod Kaufman

October 4, 2009 04:20 PM Forum: Digital SLR AstroPhotography

NGC40

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Just wanted to say that's a very nice image. I observed it a couple of weeks ago at Mt Pinos and, as always, it's a very impressive object!

August 21, 2011 05:57 PM Forum: Digital SLR AstroPhotography

Comet Garrard Aug 20

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Cool shot!

September 4, 2011 09:30 PM Forum: Digital SLR AstroPhotography

Little Dumbell

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Nice image of one of my favorite objects.

July 14, 2015 03:41 PM Forum: Digital SLR AstroPhotography

A faint Andromeda

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Not bad, not bad at all!

October 13, 2015 04:18 AM Forum: Digital SLR AstroPhotography

Andromeda mosaic

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Nice view of the "Island Universe".

December 8, 2002 06:54 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

December 8, 2002 07:01 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Celestron Ultimas

Posted By Rod Kaufman

I have the 15mm version of the celestron widefield series.A 16 mm version did not exist. The widefield versions were apparently the predecessors of the Axiom series of celestron eyepieces. I find the 15 mm widefield ultima to yield a bright and contrasty image but with coma at the edges.

March 17, 2003 09:54 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Need advice on Coma Corrector

Posted By Rod Kaufman

I have a Televue 1.25" coma corrector and it is probably one of the few remaining 1.25" units as they are now made only in the two inch size. The unit functions somewhat similiar to a barlow lens and seems to work well with meade widefield eyepieces. Premium eyepieces, such as the pentax units and the speers-waler 10mm as well as those from televue can handle a short-focus scope to f-4 so if you upgrade to one of these eyepieces a coma-corrector may not be necessary. I have a Discovery 12.5" f-5 truss dob and an Astrosystems 16" f-4.5 dob and neither require a coma corrector with premium eyepieces.

March 26, 2003 08:14 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

To Plossl or to XL?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Rob,
I have tried televue plossls in both of my dobs and I find them to be of high quality without significant ghosting issues. I am not sure of the reason for poor quality images in your scope unless seeing conditions in your area are poor or your optics are not collimated properly. I would recommend a laser collimator made by Howie Glatter. His laser costs about 100.00 for the 1.25" model but it is highly accurate and it will withstand being dropped on the ground without being de-collimated. I have found the lasers provided by Discovery to be un-collimated as have other amateurs. I returned one to Discovery and their replacement laser was even worse.

March 25, 2003 08:53 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

To Plossl or to XL?

Posted By Rod Kaufman

Rob,
I have a Discovery 12.5 truss dob and an Astrosystems truss 16" dob.I believe the pentax units work quite well and my pentax 10.5 does not ghost on Jupiter in either scope. You may also wish to try the university optics orthos or the ultima plossls which have good contrast and little or no ghosting. I read posts from other amateurs claiming their Radians do ghost on bright planets.