Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
“Governors’ party affiliation may have contributed to a range of policy decisions that, together, influenced the spread of the virus,” says study senior author Sara Benjamin-Neelon, PhD, professor in the Bloomberg School’s Department of Health, Behavior and Society. “These findings underscore the need for state policy actions that are guided by public health considerations rather than by partisan politics.”
https://www.jhsph.edu/news/news-releases/2021/as-cases-spread-across-us-last-year-pattern-emerged-suggesting-link-between-governors-party-affiliation-and-covid-19-case-and-death-numbers.html
Don't fall for the sexy headlines Rod. The actual study is here:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587838/
From the study:
Results
From March to early June, Republican-led states had lower COVID-19 incidence rates compared to Democratic-led states. On June 3, the association reversed, and Republican-led states had higher incidence (RR=1.10, 95% PI=1.01, 1.18). This trend persisted through early December. For death rates, Republican-led states had lower rates early in the pandemic, but higher rates from July 4 (RR=1.18, 95% PI=1.02, 1.31) through mid-December. Republican-led states had higher test positivity rates starting on May 30 (RR=1.70, 95% PI=1.66, 1.73) and lower testing rates by September 30 (RR=0.95, 95% PI=0.90, 0.98).ConclusionGubernatorial party affiliation may drive policy decisions that impact COVID-19 infections and deaths across the US. Future policy decisions should be guided by public health considerations rather than political ideology.Note how the conclusion is not party specific. Also the conclusion, written by public health experts ignores economic considerations. Do you think any of the bold headlines will emphasize economic impact or how policy decisions in the D states enhanced the early East Coast death rates? Those early D policy decisions on the East Coast did exactly that. So, this study begs the larger question. I'll concede that R policies enhanced the Covid death rate in the summer and fall. But how did those states economies fare, compared to their D counterparts? How does a metric of
overall civic welfare compare between these states? The study does not touch that of course.
I feel compelled to restate my opinion that anyone who will not take the simple measures of masks, distancing, work from home if possible, and getting vaccinated is a real problem. But opening the economy as in Florida and Texas have seems to be advantageous. Perhaps there are medical consequences, but the data does not show overwhelming consequences. In my opinion, whether the CA/NY response or the FL/TX response proves to be better for society on all metrics, health, economic, overall social welfare and so on is an entirely open question.
Jim