Posts Made By: Jim Moscheck

So, they should have to wear a coat and tie in the senate chambers for decorum purposes, but you are okay with a congresswoman from Colorado getting her titty massaged and her a giving him a HJ at a family friendly event. With a democrat no less! 

Got it.

Davis said: Let me just say that if that occurred that's outrageous and so she may be liable for some sort of criminal action, however that's not the issue about the Dress code in the Senate.

Oh, it occurred, watch the video I posted above. I guess you do not read the Denver papers or watch local news?

And Davis continued:

So why is it that you're now deflecting and then putting words in my mouth, because we're talking about the dress code in the Senate?

I guess since you didn't comment about Gay men riding around in the back of trucks during a rainbow pride event masturbating, then you're OK with that.

Wow, that's shocking that YOU think it is perfectly fine for a gay man to expose himself in public and then masterbate in public.

Come on, man. You are Captain Defection around these parts and everyone knows it. Does the moniker Dodgeball Davis ring a bell?

And there you go again with the gay references. What is it with you? You seem to be fascinated with all things gay. You know, if you were gay we would all be okay with it. No need to hide here, you are among friends who do not judge. Just like you who never judges.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

DS In Michigan stated:  "And there you go again with the gay references. What is it with you?"  

Yes, because I'm getting that vibe from you.  You seem to be completely infatuated with me.

Is that a problem for your wife?  After all, it occurs to me that every time you make a posting and I've not responded, you still bring up my name.

I surely am on your mind a lot, which is creepy in its own right.   

I'm thinking though that since you bring me up all the time, you've something brewing in your weird head. Please understand that I'm not interested.  Even if you were a hot gal, you're definitely not my type.  

I just hope that when you may be having an intimate moment with her, that you don't Yell out my name.  LOL  

Yeah, right. And no one else here has ever mentioned your preoccupation with using gay references.

Originally Posted by James Brown

By the way, best thread title in a very long time!

Yeah, but it was easy to come up with. Just watch the video.

Did you see her explanation on Fox News?

"First of all, what happened is I messed up. I went on a date night, and I am a congresswoman and a public figure, but believe it or not, I'm human, too," she told "Jesse Watters Primetime."

"And as a mother of four boys and a grandmother to a beautiful grandson, that's my first job before anything else and my priority," she added. "It's certainly been taxing on me and my family." 

"It's been 20 years since I was in the dating scene, and back then there were not infrared cameras watching my every move, but it's a lesson learned," Boebert continued. "As I said, I'm truly humbled and apologize to my people in Colorado's 3rd District, those who I love. 

In my position, it is my responsibility to bring levity to my constituents' lives, never gravity."

So, being a slutty grandma is her first priority. And yeah, it was pretty funny bringing all that levity to a crowded theater full of children.

Oops, it's been so long since she dated her excuse is she no idea you could actually see in the dark. That is hilarious.

Originally Posted by James Brown

True, but the word lie has indeed been weaponized to mean opinions one does not agree with.

Does not make it right no matter which side does it.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Did Joe Biden lie when he stated dozens and dozens of times in public, that he never ever discussed Hunter Biden's business dealings with his son Hunter? 

Did Joe Biden use his power when he was Vice President to get Ukranian Prosecutor Shokin fired?  Did he brag about it?  Was Shokin investigating Burisma and their corrupt business dealings with his son Hunter?

Newt Gingrich stated that we may have a criminal family sitting in the White House:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/newt-gingrich-says-that-even-the-new-york-times-will-have-to-accept-that-we-may-have-a-criminal-family-sitting-in-the-white-house/ss-AA1hbCFs?ocid=msedgntp&c=W129&cvid=8750ba70dc4f4921a87a2c5271e42d80&ei=8#image=1

Is Newt Gingrich a radical right wing nutjob?

Up to your old tactics I see. Good luck with that.

I thought this thread was about guns.

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-suggests-mark-milley-executed-063701241.html

Quoted from the article:

"Donald Trump made a series of aggressive comments on social media about outgoing head of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley, suggesting the top military leader’s conduct was worthy of execution.

“Mark Milley, who led perhaps the most embarrassing moment in American history with his grossly incompetent implementation of the withdrawal from Afghanistan, costing many lives, leaving behind hundreds of American citizens, and handing over BILLIONS of dollars of the finest military equipment ever made, will be leaving the military next week,” Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social on Friday.

“This will be a time for all citizens of the USA to celebrate!” he continued. “This guy turned out to be a Woke train wreck who, if the Fake News reporting is correct, was actually dealing with China to give them a heads up on the thinking of the President of the United States. This is an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH!”

The Independent has contacted the Joint Chiefs of Staff for comment.

The former president’s comments could potentially run afoul of his release conditions ahead of his trials related to the special counsel investigations against him in the Mar-a-Lago documents and 2020 election conspiracy cases. He has been warned to avoid publicly attacking court officers and potential witnesses on social media.

If Mr Milley is in fact a witness in either of these case, Mr Trump could face serious penalties.

My bet: Donald Trump is threatening General Milley because General Milley is on the government’s witness list for the trial in the Mar-a-Lago documents case," former New York Attorney General’s Office official Tristan Snell wrote on X on Saturday.

Mr Trump’s attacks on Mr Milley come after the military official was featured in an in-depth profile in The Atlantic, where the general described Mr Trump’s “disturbing” alleged lack of respect for the armed forces.

He described how at a 2019 event, Mr Trump reportedly expressed disgust that Luis Avila, an Army veteran who served five combat tours and lost his leg in an IED attack, was chosen to sing “God Bless America.”

Why do you bring people like that here? No one wants to see that, the wounded,” Mr Trump allegedly said."

End of quote from article....


How in the world is Trump the frontrunner for the GOP nomination? Really. I want to know how this piece of shit checks off the boxes for you as far as presidential material goes. If Mitch McConnell had any backbone at all this could have been all over in 2021 before he left office. He actually had the gall to say if he is guilty of crimes the courts could decide it. Now, 91 counts in four indictments later and trials beginning soon Trump is still threatening witnesses. This is not the country I remember growing up in. The fact this man might still incite more violence and a portion of this country does not care or unfailingly supports this vile sack of orange vomit is beyond me.

Your GOP frontrunner for president. Y'all should be be so proud.

Although, let's not forget he has presidential experience when it comes to whales.

Originally Posted by James Brown

In other words, the voters are the first guardrail and I can't see a majority of the EC going his way.   Jim

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/09/donald-trump-democracy-media-2024-election

In late September 2016, Salena Zito wrote glowingly in The Atlantic about Donald Trump on the campaign trail in Pittsburgh and famously postulated that “the press takes him literally, but not seriously,” while “his supporters take him seriously, but not literally.” Leaving aside Zito’s kid-glove treatment of Trump, she wasn’t wrong about the media, which even now—a chaotic presidency, a couple impeachments, an insurrection, and four criminal indictments later—isn’t taking the former guy returning to power “seriously” enough. With the 2024 cycle in full swing, he’s being largely covered like a normal candidate rather than someone who tried to end democracy. As Trump recently tossed out wild accusations of “treason” this past weekend, The Nation’s Jeet Heer noted how the Drudge Report “is more accurately conveying the gravity of Trump’s threat to USA democracy than the mainstream media.”

and after the rant that prompted this thread:

Oddly, Trump’s dangerous rant was not treated as the major news it absolutely should have been. “Only CNN and MSNBC covered Trump’s inflammatory Truth Social post about the general,” Media Matters noted Tuesday, “while broadcast news outlets and Fox News completely ignored it.”

"But yeah, Biden's too old. My investments did really well during the trump years so I'll give him another chance", says a good portion of the electorate who think the biased news they prefer is the only news that's not fake.