Posts Made By: James Brown

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Why is it that you and the left here and everywhere invariably and continuously misconstrue what everyone on the right says regarding vaccines?

When did Ron Johnson, in his presentation, or EVER for that matter, argue AGAINST the vaccines?

Do you purposely do this knowing that he never said "don't take the vaccines, because they don't work", or is it just a failure of yours to curb your pre-conceived notions about his take on the virus?

So you and Ron Johnson are pro-vaccine now?

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

I didnt see it as an argument -against- the vaccine.....merely a push regarding we are not being given all the facts. There is plenty of evidence that reveals it does have effectiveness although I believe we may be being misled as to just how much.

Ok, I disagree on us being misled, but I understand your point.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Yes it was modified, because specific sentences were taken out of whole paragraphs that I wrote, for you and others to achieve a desired effect by you, James, and Rod.

No sir, James quoted your entire post.  Nothing was changed.  Not even the emphasis or emojis.  See the screen captures juxtaposed below.  I know that you can not and will not ever admit it, but you are simply wrong.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

...each person should check with their doctor to see if they have a pre-existing condition which would tend to make the vaccine more dangerous to their health, or are so obtuse that you just think this vaccine won't hurt anyone out there, or won't cause medical problems for some?  

Let me explain to you since you're so confused.  NOT ALL vaccines should be given to everyone.  

NOT ALL Pills should be taken by everyone.  

Its as simple as that.  

I agree with the above 100%.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Oh, and since you are ignoring my other posting whereby I called you out for selectively truncating my post, where you lied about me, I'll ask you here, was that just an error on your part or was it purposeful deception?

I mean to say we can go all day long, back and forth saying "who's on first", but the fact is, you in fact lied about my position on the Corona vaccine in the other thread.

Would you care to apologize to me or just admit that you were wrong?

I'll adopt your line above and throw it back in your face, since it is so applicable here..


I know that you can not and will not ever admit it, but you are simply wrong.

I have no idea what you are talking about.  I have not deceptively edited any of your posts. 

Ever

Often, when I am replying to one or two comments you have made in a lengthy rambling word-salad of a post, I'll only quote the part I am replying to.  But I always quote the entirety of the germane part I am replying to and I never drop important or relevant content from a quote.  You on the other hand do that sort of thing all the time.  It is easy to find examples where you have played the deceptive quote card.  I pointed one of yours out a week or two ago.  You will never find James or myself playing deceptive quote games, even though we might truncate irrelevant portions of a rambling post of yours.  Goodness knows your posts are often over-long!  

In this case, James edited his own post, not your quote.  Anyone can see that in the images I posted.  You are totally gone on this issue.

Originally Posted by James Brown

I have no idea what you are talking about. 

Listen Rich - show me the differences between James' post #34 and your post #26, the one he was quoting.  There are images of your post and his quote below.  Put up or shut up!  Where are the differences!!

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

I noticed you truncated my posting, whereby you lied about me.

I'll ask the question again, and perhaps you'll grow a pair and answer, or stay a deceitful coward.  

That will be your choice.  

You implied I was against the vaccine.  

I'm not, and I never have been so why did you lie about me?

You said:      "So you and Ron Johnson are pro-vaccine now"?

I've always been for vaccines and this vaccine so tell me when I said I was against this vaccine.

Truncating a quote promotes clarity.  Deceptive editing is entirely different as you well know, you being the king of deceptive editing.  

I'm glad to be corrected and glad to hear that you are pro-vaccine.  I obviously misunderstood your position based upon the entirety of your commentary here since about March of 2020.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Listen RINO,

Are you this obtuse?  I just posted the words that are attached to posting #34 where it shows that James EDITED His posting 24 minutes after he initially posted it.

It is impossible to put up the original that he initially posted at 9:09.  My posting was changed by him, to leave out a great deal of what I printed, and then I called him on it.   
The evidence is right there in front of your face:  

Directly from #34 posting (cut and pasted):

Posted 10/02/2021 09:09AM | Edited 10/02/2021 09:33AM #34
James Lacey

I just put up, so I'm done with it.  

If you are still confused, go see a therapist

So, you are refusing to point out any alleged differences between your post and James' quote?  Good move, since there are no differences.  It was, is and remains a perfectly accurate quote of your post #24. 

If you are trying to say that James originally posted a deceptively edited quote and then "fixed it" after you called him on it, that too does not fly.  James edited his post  before your reply.  You see that don't you?  Maybe James is psychic?  And if it was such a big deal, why didn't you quote James' allegedly deceptively edited content when you had the chance?  Was your own quote button broken at the time?  Yes, I am mocking you.  It is obvious to me and I presume everyone else that you have been caught with your pants down Rich...  Again.

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

I agree as well.....

What I dont agree with is the woke crowd that wants to make the vaccine a good vs evil debate. Painting pretty much anyone with the same broad brush regardless of their status ie having natural immunity or not, if they refuse the vaccine then they are evil.....plenty of that sort of brow beating going on out there, even here to a degree.

I understand and in part feel the same way you do Greg, though maybe not so much on this issue.  A significant chunk of the press and 1/2 the public paints anything conservative, traditional, or religious as evil or stupid.  Exploiting reaction to this sort of dismissive condescension (perhaps most succinctly voiced by Clinton with the basket of deplorables comment) was Trump's life blood. 

I sure do regret however, that the disinclination to get vaccinated has in part followed party lines, no matter who is to blame for this phenomenon.  Your position on acquired immunity is defensible.  But there are a lot of people out there with no vaccination, no acquired immunity and strong aversion to this vaccine.  This is a real shame, and a real public health risk. 

The browbeating  tactics of the woke crowd always backfire.  But in this instance I personally hope any un-vaccinated people with no acquired immunity who have dug in to their position because of woke browbeating can transcend any hate or snobbery thrown their way and get vaccinated for their own good and for the larger social good.  I get it that there are legitimate reasons for some people to avoid the vaccines, I'm not talking about those people. 

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

No I just proved that at 9:09 James posted, and then at 9:33, he edited and modified his posting.

You can ignore that all you want.  

I was writing my response while he was he was changing it. 

Let me just reiterate to you, I couldn't give 2 shits what you believe or not.  

You cape isn't getting any stiffer, its still a wilted piece of lettuce.    

I don't believe you.  But even if James did edit the quote to revert the quote text back to an un-edited original, So what!  James edited his post before you replied.  You admit that just above. Even if he un-edited a previously doctored quote, he did it of his own volition! 

Hell, It's possible I suppose that James did make an edit to your quote and after re-reading he thought to himself, "that wasn't fair" and he then fixed it.  Good for James!  Bravo!  You should consider that some time when you engage in grossly deceptive quote misconstruction.  More likely he edited to replace his original comments with the hilarious dog and baby meme.   You got nothing here.

Jim

p.s.  Russ has a cape.  I wear a long black duster and a cassock sort of thingy.