Posts Made By: James Brown

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

Wow.....I guess Rich is right, you really are that dumb lol

Your own link proves you wrong and you still actually try to use it to prove you are right?? Thanks I needed a good chuckle today

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Boy your attempts to defend your buddy's stupidity here is becoming legendary.

Do you want to now tell me that I'm reaching another "lowest of the lows", because your good friend here Rod, cannot read written English?

Is that what you're just itching to say?  

I thought your cape was wilted before, now its getting brown and crusty like old lettuce!    

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

No, again we are NOT talking about all firearms here

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

That's not true at all.  My buddy down in Pueblo grabs his AR-15 and takes it out in the field with him to kill rattlesnakes.  

And it is USED for DEFENSE OFTEN.

Do you want to bet me?  

You DO NOT know what you're talking about.  

Originally Posted by Brian McFarland

Yes, YOU were talking about rifles in a conversation about gun control. Mel brought up gun control in post 13. Gun control. Not rifle control.  Try and keep up, and try not moving the goalposts when you have no point.

Originally Posted by James Brown

PS (on edit).  I just re-read the whole thread and see that Rod was talking about guns, not rifles when Rich switched him.  The following post is still true, in my opinion, but I no longer think Rod is missing a point.  Rich merely tricked him and I missed that when I jumped in to the middle of a thread.

Hi Rod:

I think you are missing a point here.  The point is that handguns, not rifles kill so many people.  Yet the gun law crowd wants to ban a specific rifle style.  There is a logical disconnect that is important.  Since rifles are used so infrequently in crimes, why ban them?

Here are some possible replies I've seen to that question:

1.  Even though rifles are infrequently used in murders, they are often used in mass shootings like Las Vegas.

2.  Rifles like the AR-15 and similar platforms are not used for defense or hunting, which are the two reasons behind Heller.  (This one is BS since people do hunt with so-called "assault weapons" and tons of people use them for home defense.)  Even so, I have seen this bad reason thrown into the conversation.

Personally, I am pretty sure that the gun law crowd goes after the "assault weapon" style of rifle because of the way they look, not for any legally compelling reason.  They would go after all guns, but the 2nd Amendment as interpreted in Heller prohibits it.

Jim

Originally Posted by Brian McFarland

You're all a bunch of bulbous fatheads. LOL

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

That's not true at all.  My buddy down in Pueblo grabs his AR-15 and takes it out in the field with him to kill rattlesnakes.  

And it is USED for DEFENSE OFTEN.

Do you want to bet me?  

You DO NOT know what you're talking about.  

Originally Posted by James Brown

Can anyone recall a previous reply from Rich that so clearly demonstrates he is either:

1.  Entirely illiterate, or
2.  The most dishonest fool to ever walk the planet?

I can't stop laughing, given the context of Rich acting like Rod can't read because Rich slipped the "rifle" swithcheroo past him.  But seriously, my guess, since I'm a generous guy, is (3.) Rich simply stopped reading after the first clause in his glee to school me.  But where is his "oops, I didn't read the rest of your post" apology.  Nothing.  Crickets.  That sort of admission is not in Rich's playbook.

Jim

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

I never "switched him". 

Sorry your spin isn't relevant here.

I made a posting about knives vs. Rifles.

It was very simple and direct, and Roddie 3 cells, misread it.

No switching involved.  

Anything else Caped Crusader?