Posts Made By: James Brown

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

As always, time will tell, Greg. I think the second impeachment of trump was rushed, not enough facts were known at the time, and that the GOP stonewalled the whole damn thing. At what point, if ever, will you look at any evidence regarding trump and his minions and not just shoot the messengers? Last time I looked Liz Cheney was one of the most conservative members of the house, but now she's vilified, along with Adam Kinzinger, by sitting on the house committee, of which your party refused to bilaterally participate, looking into what happened on Jan. 6th. Is she still not a real conservative? The GOP is f'd up, man. Is this demagogue you all worship really worth it?  

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

Would I vote for him again? Probably......depends on who else was running.

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

I don't believe Schiff "doctored" anything nor do I believe any of the other charges this guy from the Federalist brings up, might as well through in the kitchen sink, too. 
Here's a tip: anything emanating with Jim Jordan ought to be a red flag that the problem begins and ends with that name...

Originally Posted by James Lacey

This tactic is no different from Adam Schiff's bad behavior when he only partially quoted a text message when presenting evidence at Mark Meadow's contempt hearing.

Originally Posted by James Lacey

They should not have done that and been entirely transparent, but isn't this just a distraction? It doesn't invalidate all the other text messages and communications the committee revealed. And it should bother all of us that Republicans in Trump's circle were even discussing how they could subvert a free and fair election. Trump's inaction on that day is still a vital issue as well. It's no surprise that some would view the committee as nothing more than a political witch hunt, whereas others see it as a crusade of justice. I mainly want them to codify and fix the vague electoral college rules that can even lead people to think they can declare a national emergency to hold onto power. It will be enough to improve our weak systems that a narcissistic demagogue can exploit. I'm guessing one of these days there will be another Trump, and help us all if he's intelligent and competent instead of a blundering fool.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Since this is the "politics" forum.  I have a question for you.

What "political issues" or "political agenda" that Trump promoted or enacted did you/do you disagree with?

What "political issues" or "political agenda" that Biden has promoted or enacted did you/do you agree with?

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

Here's the extent of the "doctoring":
"A committee source tells CNN an aide inadvertently placed a period before the end of a sentence in the graphic that was not in the original text"
More importantly:
 "Rep. Jim Jordan forwarded a text message to then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows on January 5, outlining a legal theory that then-Vice President Mike Pence had the authority to stand in the way of the certification of the 2020 election."
"A spokesperson for Jordan, an Ohio Republican, confirmed to CNN that he forwarded a text to Meadows on January 5 that was sent to him by Joseph Schmitz, a former Department of Defense inspector general. Schmitz's text included a draft presentation arguing that Pence had the constitutional authority to object to the certification of election results from certain states."
https://www.wral.com/jim-jordan-sent-one-of-the-texts-revealed-by-january-6-committee/20037217/
In addition to the above, here's what Jim Jordan has been up to:
https://www.justsecurity.org/77852/timeline-rep-jim-jordan-a-systematic-disinformation-campaign-and-january-6/
Finally, here's Jim Jordan on whether or not he spoke to Trump on Jan 6th. IN ALL HONESTY, JIM, DO YOU FIND THIS GUY TO BE A CREDIBLE WITNESS?:
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/07/30/jim-jordan-trump-conversation-sot-jan-6-dlt-dons-take-vpx.cnn

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Establishment Republicans like yourself have caused us to be in the economic, social, and politically destructive situations that we find ourselves in today.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Disagree however you like.  

You and the rest of the Personality voters, saddled us with the FULL control of the Democrats who WILL destroy this country if not stopped.

I vote Issues, and You vote personality, just like the women who voted for Bill Clinton because he was good looking.

IMO, there is not a dime's worth of difference between you and them.

I vote substance, issues, and conservative agenda, and you vote personality.  

There was no "name calling" of you by me in the least.  That's simply a convenient excuse on your part, to not have a discussion.  

I simply stated facts of the way you vote and now you are using the "name calling" line as an excuse for not being able (on your part) to answer straight forward Questions posed to you, because it will expose you as what I've observed of you, that of being a "personality" voter over a  "substance and issues" voter.

And because you want to vote that way, it is fine, many in society do, but don't try to sugar coat your method as being anything other than what it is. 

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

You mean NASA.